Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:54:33.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximum likelihood estimation of fossil assemblage composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Richard C. Holtzman
Richard C. Holtzman*
Affiliation:
Minnesota Geological Survey, 1633 Eustis Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most common methods of estimating the relative abundance of species in a fossil assemblage are all maximum likelihood estimates. They differ from one another in their inherent assumptions made about the effects of fragmentation and differential preservation in the assemblage. For many fossil assemblages, relative abundance is best estimated by the relative frequency of specimens or relative frequency of elements. Monte Carlo simulations suggest, however, that in most other circumstances estimates based on frequency of elements divided by the number of elements in a complete individual provide greater accuracy than estimates based on minimum number of individuals. This relation results from an interaction between random sampling error and a variety of biases inherent in the two estimates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Spring 1979 , pp. 77 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Chaplin, R. E. 1971. The Study of Animal Bones from Archeological Sites. 170 pp. Seminar Press; London and New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J. and Kietzke, K. K. 1967. Paleoecology of the lower nodular zone, Brule Formation, in the Big Badlans of South Dakota. Fieldiana: Geol. Mem. 5:111–137.Google Scholar
Conover, W. J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 462 pp. John Wiley and Sons; New York.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1967. The vertebrate fauna and hunting patterns. Pp. 132–178. In: Byers, D. S., ed. The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Univ. Tex. Press; Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1973. The methodology of faunal analysis. Am. Antiq. 39:432–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1978a. Minimum numbers and sample size in vertebrate faunal analysis. Am. Antiq. 43:53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1978b. Reconstructing mammalian communities: a discussion of Shotwell's method of paleoecological analysis. Paleobiology 4:77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 1968. Paleoecology of the large-mammal community in interior Alaska during the Late Pleistocene. Am. Nat. 79:346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, R. C. 1978. Late Paleocene mammals of the Tongue River Formation, western North Dakota. N. Dakota Geol. Surv. Rept. Invest. 65:1–88.Google Scholar
Howard, H. 1930. A census of the Pleistocene birds of Rancho La Brea from the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Condor. 32:81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. R. 1968. Taphonomy and information losses in fossil communities. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 79:1315–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D. Jr. 1964. The prehistoric fauna from Shanidar, Iraq. Science. 144:1565–1566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shotwell, J. A. 1955. An approach to the paleoecology of mammals. Ecology. 36:327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. 1958. Inter-community relationships in Hemphillian (mid-Pliocene) mammals. Ecology. 39:271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. 1963. The Juntura Basin: studies in earth history and paleoecology. Part 1. Pliocene mammalian communities of the Juntura Basin. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. n.s. 53:7–21.Google Scholar
Stock, C. 1929. A census of the Pleistocene mammals of Rancho La Brea, based on the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. J. Mammal. 10:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L. and Sloan, R. E. 1965. The earliest primates. Science. 150:743–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voorhies, M. R. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an Early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Contrib. Geol. Univ. Wyo., Spec. Pap. 1:1–69.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1970. Sampling difficulties in reconstructing Late Tertiary mammalian communities. Proc. N. Am. Paleontol. Conv. 1969:454–468.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W. 1960. Early Miocene rodents and insectivores from northeastern Colorado. Univ. Kans. Paleontol. Contrib. Vert. 7:1–92.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M., and Bambach, R. K. 1968. The composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities. Lethaia. 1:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar