Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-rgmxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-20T12:17:49.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hierarchies in biology and paleontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

James W. Valentine  and
Cathleen L. May
James W. Valentine
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Cathleen L. May
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hierarchies in natural science are ranked and nested structures such that units at each rank include parts that are units at lower ranks. Hierarchies are able to render complexity tractable, by homogenizing units into collectives and by ordering collectives in ranks of increasing inclusiveness. Hierarchies contrast with positional structures, such as phylogenetic trees, for in trees all positions are occupied by the same sort of entity—there are no ranked collectives—and positions are specified by the order of appearance or precedence of the entities. In hierarchies, interactions within ranks are most important; in trees, sequences of events along branches are of primary concern. As a result hierarchies do, and trees do not, display emergent properties.

The value of the hierarchical structure can be lost when ranks are misspecified. A common error is the use of only a fraction of entities that actually occur in a rank, as when genes are considered as a rank below cells, disregarding the remaining cell contents and rendering the nature of cellular organization moot. Misspecification is also common when attributes or processes are used in ranks without indications of the physical entities to which they refer, thus losing track of the proper composition and ranking of the collectives.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 23 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B. 1982. Hierarchy; perspectives in ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. J., and Fistrup, K. 1982. The theory of evolution by natural selection: a hierarchical expansion. Paleobiology 8:113–129.Google Scholar
Beckner, M. 1974. Reduction, hierarchies and organicism. pp. 163–177In Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T., eds. Studies in the philosophy of biology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished synthesis: biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1986. Information, economics and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17:351–369.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Salthe, S. N. 1984. Hierarchy and evolution. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1:184–208.Google Scholar
Flexner, S. B., ed. 1987. The Random House dictionary of the English language, 2d. ed.Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 25:536–544.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1982. Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science 216:380–387.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1985. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:2–12.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. 1988. Genetics, paleontology and macroevolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae, 10th ed. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought; diversity, evolution and inheritance. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
McMahon, J. A., Phillips, D. L., Robinson, J. V., and Schimpf, D. J. 1978. Levels of biological organization: an organism-centered approach. Bioscience 28:700–704.Google Scholar
McShea, D. W. 1991. Complexity and evolution: what everybody knows. Biology and Philosophy 6:303–324.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. 1974. A geometric model of reduction and emergence. pp. 57–63In Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T., eds. Studies in the philosophy of biology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. III. 1991. Hierarchical concept of reef development. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 182:21–35.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1992. Classification, evolution and the nature of biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Salthe, S. N. 1985. Evolving hierarchical systems, their structure and representation. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salthe, S. N. 1993. Development and evolution. MIT Press, New York.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106:467–482.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1973. The organization of complex systems. pp. 1–27in Pattee, H. H., ed. Hierarchy theory, the challenge of complex systems. Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., and Weiner, E. J. C., preparers. 1989. Oxford English dictionary, 2d ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striedter, G. T., and Northcutt, R. G. 1991. Biological hierarchies and the concept of homology. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 38:177–189.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary paleoecology of the marine biosphere. Prentice-Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S., and Eldredge, N. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 10:146–171.Google Scholar
Wicken, J. S. 1979. The generation of complexity in evolution: a thermodynamic and information-theoretic discussion. Journal of Theoretical Biology 77:349–365.Google Scholar