Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-8cpv7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-10T16:48:31.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From the brink of extinction: rediscovery of two endemic tree species of Myrcia (Myrtaceae) in urban Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2025

Thiago Fernandes*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Davi Nepomuceno da Silva Machado
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Carlos Daniel Miranda Ferreira
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Thais Vasconcelos
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Eve J. Lucas
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
João Marcelo Alvarenga Braga
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author, thiago_f.s@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report the rediscovery of two endemic tree species of the genus Myrcia (Myrtaceae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest in 2021–2022. Both Myrcia colpodes and Myrcia rubiginosa were previously known from a small number of specimens collected mostly in the 19th century in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil. Living specimens had not been recorded since 1958 and 2005, respectively. We provide here photographic documentation and updated risk assessments for both species, which will be submitted to IUCN for a formal assessment. Our findings illustrate that rare species that have not been collected for long periods can sometimes be found in plain sight in urban forest fragments. We also highlight the importance of protected areas for the conservation of forest trees, in particular rediscovered species. We recommend a number of conservation actions and encourage the Brazilian government, scientific institutions and civil society to acknowledge the importance of these species and to act to safeguard their future.

Information

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

The genus Myrcia (Myrtaceae, the guava family) is one of the largest angiosperm tree genera, with c. 800 species and a native range extending from southern Mexico to tropical Central and South America (POWO, 2024). The state of Rio de Janeiro is one of the smallest in Brazil (c. 44,000 km2) and one of the most densely populated (c. 16 million inhabitants; IBGE, 2024). It is a key region for Myrcia, harbouring 113 (28%) of the 402 species known to occur in Brazil (Santos et al., Reference Santos, Amorim, Burton, Fernandes, Gaem and Lourenço2020) in just 0.5% of the country.

Species of Myrcia are primarily pollinated by bees and produce edible fruits that are a significant food source for frugivores in the Atlantic Forest (Pizo, Reference Pizo, Levey, Silva and Galetti2000; Gressler et al., Reference Gressler, Pizo and Morellato2006; Staggemeier et al., Reference Staggemeier, Cazetta and Morellato2017), thus forming a key ecological component of this phytogeographic domain (Murray-Smith, Reference Murray-Smith, Brummitt, Oliveira-Filho, Bachman, Moat, Nic Lughadha and Lucas2009; Lucas & Bünger, Reference Lucas and Bünger2015). Despite their ecological importance, dozens of Myrcia species are known only from a small number of specimens and have not been recorded in the wild for a long time, qualifying them as so-called ‘lost species’ (Long & Rodriguez, Reference Long and Rodríguez2022). Of the 254 species of Myrcia recorded in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Santos et al., Reference Santos, Amorim, Burton, Fernandes, Gaem and Lourenço2020), 86 are known from ≤ 15 herbarium specimens (T. Fernandes, unpubl. data, 2020). This situation leads to an acute lack of primary data to support subsequent studies on ecology, evolution and conservation (see Rivers et al., Reference Rivers, Taylor, Brummitt, Meagher, Roberts and Lughadha2011; Goodwin et al., Reference Goodwin, Muñoz-Rodríguez, Harris, Wells, Wood, Filer and Scotland2020). Plant conservation science relies heavily on occurrence data from herbarium records, and gaps in taxonomic information in these collections can have serious implications for conservation planning and prioritization of conservation interventions (Colli-Silva et al., Reference Colli-Silva, Reginato, Cabral, Forzza, Pirani and Vasconcelos2020).

We rediscovered two endemic species of Myrcia during field expeditions in 2021–2022 in forest remnants in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Both Myrcia colpodes (Kiaerskou, Reference Kiaerskou and Warming1893) and Myrcia rubiginosa (Cambessèdes, Reference Cambessèdes, Saint-Hilaire, Jussieu and Cambessèdes1832) were known to have restricted geographical distributions and were last recorded in 1958 and 2005, respectively. They were previously known from only a few specimens (fertile branches) collected in the state of Rio de Janeiro, mostly in the 19th century.

Following the rediscoveries, populations were revisited according to their phenology, with visits scheduled to coincide with flowering and fruiting periods. The visits were made until November 2024 to gather information on population size and to collect fertile branches for deposit in scientific collections (collector T. Fernandes, field numbers 918, 925, 934, 943, 1007, 1088, 1264, 1332 and 1385 for M. rubiginosa, and 1006, 1013, 1060 and 1484 for M. colpodes). These specimens were deposited at the herbarium of the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden (RB) with duplicates distributed to herbaria located in Brazil (MBM, MBML, NIT, RBR, RFFP, SPF), France (P), the UK (K) and USA (NY, US; herbarium acronyms follow Thiers, Reference Thiers2024). In addition, five saplings of each species were collected and transplanted to a nursery in the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, where they are currently being cultivated in the institution’s arboretum for ex situ conservation purposes. Following a careful examination of the herbarium specimens derived from our collections, we produced a comprehensive taxonomic treatment of the rediscovered taxa (Fernandes et al., Reference Fernandes, Lucas, Vasconcelos and Braga2025), providing updated morphological descriptions along with notes on their taxonomy, distribution, habitat, and phenology.

Myrcia colpodes (Plate 1ad) was first described from specimens collected in 1862 from a forest fragment (Morro da Viração) in the municipality of Niterói, currently a protected area under municipal management (Parque Natural Municipal de Niterói; Fig. 1). The species was subsequently collected from unspecified localities in 1867 and 1880. The last collection was in 1958 in the Tijuca Massif in the city of Rio de Janeiro, most of which is currently a protected area under federal management (Parque Nacional da Tijuca; Fig. 1). We were unable to locate M. colpodes in either of these areas despite our targeted search efforts. However, in 2022, 64 years after the last collection, we rediscovered two populations of five mature trees each in forest fragments 30–40 km to the east in the municipality of Maricá, in a municipally administered protected area (Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Municipal das Serras de Maricá; Fig. 1). Despite being a protected area, we found no physical delimitation, signage or evidence of protective management. In addition to its proximity to farms and the tourist beach of Sacristia, a further threat in this location is the occurrence of the invasive Mauritius hemp Furcraea foetida (Asparagaceae).

Fig 1. Location of historical and current occurrence records of Myrcia colpodes and M. rubiginosa. The inset map shows the location of the main map in south-eastern Brazil. ES, Espírito Santo; MG, Minas Gerais; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; SP, São Paulo.

Plate 1 (a–d) Myrcia colpodes and (e–h) Myrcia rubiginosa in their natural habitat: (a), (e) trunk; (b), (f) young shoots; (c), (g) flowering branch with a flower highlighted; (d), (h) fruiting branch with a fruit highlighted. Photos: (a,b,d-h) Thiago Fernandes, (c) Carlos Ferreira.

Myrcia colpodes is categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Canteiro & Lucas, Reference Canteiro and Lucas2019a). Given our findings regarding threats and population size, with an extent of occurrence (EOO) of only 75 km² and severely fragmented subpopulations, we recommend the categorization (IUCN, 2012, 2024) as Critically Endangered should be maintained based on criteria B1abiii; i.e. with EOO < 100 km² (B1), severely fragmented subpopulations (a) and a continuing decline inferred (b) in the area, extent and/or quality of the habitat (iii). Our updated assessment with additional data will be formalized by submission to IUCN.

Myrcia rubiginosa (Plate 1eh) was first collected between 1816 and 1821 in the Tijuca massif (Fig. 1) but we were unable to locate it there, despite our targeted search efforts. However, in 2021 we found two populations in a protected area under state management (Parque Estadual da Serra da Tiririca, Fig. 1) in the municipality of Niterói. One population, located in Alto Mourão, comprises 12 mature individuals; the other, in Córrego dos Colibris, consists of a single mature individual. Following our rediscovery, we searched recent herbaria collections and found three additional samples of M. rubiginosa among misidentified plant material collected in this protected area in 1982, 2001 and 2005. Two further populations were subsequently identified in the Parque Natural Municipal de Niterói (Fig. 1), each comprising a single mature individual. Previously undocumented, the species’ ripe fruits are purple berries with a sweet, whitish pulp (Plate 1).

Myrcia rubiginosa is categorized as Data Deficient on the IUCN Red List (Canteiro & Lucas, Reference Canteiro and Lucas2019b) and the data presented here provide important new information. Despite its occurrence within protected areas, the species faces threats from habitat fragmentation, urban development and wildfires (SEA & INEA, 2015; SMARHS, 2021). Its EOO is 50 km², with severely fragmented subpopulations. Based on our findings, we reassess the extinction risk (IUCN, 2012, 2024) for M. rubiginosa as Endangered based on criteria B1abiii; i.e. with EOO < 5,000 km² (B1), severely fragmented subpopulations (a) and a continuing decline inferred (b) in the area, extent and/or quality of the habitat (iii). Our new assessment will be formalized by submission to IUCN.

To ensure that the data and recommendations from this research are used to develop and implement public policies by the Brazilian government, we will provide the relevant information to the Brazilian National Center for Conservation of Flora (CNCFlora), which is the entity responsible for publishing the official list of endangered and protected species under national legislation. In addition, we call on the Brazilian government, scientific institutions and civil society to act to conserve these rediscovered but rare species. Specifically, we recommend the following six actions: (1) Further targeted collection efforts should be made to search for additional populations of M. colpodes and M. rubiginosa in other potential areas of occurrence. (2) Species population dynamics and methods of pollination, seed dispersal and germination need to be examined to provide fundamental data for in situ conservation planning. (3) Effective management, continuous monitoring and strict law enforcement should be implemented in protected areas to ensure they fulfill their conservation purpose. (4) Visitors to protected areas such as national, natural and municipal parks, and residents in adjacent areas, need to be made aware of the presence of rare and threatened plants, drawing attention to their uniqueness as endemic species and explaining their role in maintaining the forest dynamics and associated ecosystem services. (5) Information material should be produced and disseminated widely to raise awareness of the rare and threatened species occurring in forest remnants, and to foster pride and encourage a sense of stewardship and responsibility amongst local communities. People should be encouraged to adopt roles as protectors and conservators of these species, for example by anonymously reporting ongoing or imminent environmental crimes to the relevant authorities. (6) Seeds of these rediscovered taxa should be collected and distributed amongst private and public horticultural establishments and botanical gardens for ex situ conservation, following the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, Target 8, which aims to minimize the impacts of climate change on biodiversity and build resilience (CBD, 2024). Together, these efforts can help to ensure the persistence of these unique plants in the Atlantic Forest.

Author contributions

Data collection: TF, JMAB, DNSM, CDMF; conservation assessment: TF, CDMF; photographs and plates: TF, CDMF; writing and revision: all authors.

Acknowledgements

We thank the RB herbarium at the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden and the NIT herbarium at the Federal Fluminense University for laboratory support; the Municipal Government of Niterói, the Parque Natural Municipal de Niterói (PARNIT), the Instituto Estadual do Meio Ambiente (INEA) and the Parque Estadual da Serra da Tiririca (PESET) for granting permission for collection and research in these protected areas; Odimar Gomes Júnior, Administrator of FFP/UERJ, and driver Rogerio Conceição de Souza, for transport to the municipality of Maricá for data collection. TF was supported by a scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (finance code 141327/2020-0); CDMF received financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (finance code #E-26/201.036/2019) and IdeaWild (finance code 501c(3)).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards. All plant material was collected under permits from the relevant authorities (Parque Natural Municipal de Niterói Process 250000928/2021; Parque Estadual da Serra da Tiririca and Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Municipal das Serras de Maricá Process SEI-070002/012349/2021).

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and in the scientific collections in which the specimens of M. colpodes and M. rubiginosa were deposited. Additional data are available from the corresponding author, TF, upon reasonable request.

References

Canteiro, C. & Lucas, E. (2019a) Myrcia colpodes. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T113036759A113050171.en.Google Scholar
Canteiro, C. & Lucas, E. (2019b) Myrcia rubiginosa. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T113044164A113050476.en.Google Scholar
Cambessèdes, J. (1832) Myrtaceae. In Flora Brasiliae Meridionalis, Vol. 2 (eds Saint-Hilaire, A., Jussieu, A. & Cambessèdes, J.), pp. 277381. A. Belin Bibliopolam, Paris, France.Google Scholar
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2024) Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. The Targets 2011–2020. cbd.int/gbf/targets/8 [accessed 31 July 2025].Google Scholar
Colli-Silva, M., Reginato, M., Cabral, A., Forzza, R.C., Pirani, J.R. & Vasconcelos, T.N.C. (2020) Evaluating shortfalls and spatial accuracy of biodiversity documentation in the Atlantic Forest, the most diverse and threatened Brazilian phytogeographic domain. Taxon, 69, 567577.10.1002/tax.12239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, T., Lucas, E.J., Vasconcelos, T.N. & Braga, J.M.A. (2025) Extended description and taxonomic notes on two recently rediscovered Myrcia (Myrtaceae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Rodriguesia, 76, e00292024.10.1590/2175-7860202576005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Z.A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, P.M., Harris, D.J., Wells, T., Wood, J.R.I., Filer, D. & Scotland, R.W. (2020) How long does it take to discover a species? Systematics and Biodiversity, 18, 784793.10.1080/14772000.2020.1751339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressler, E., Pizo, A.M. & Morellato, P.C. (2006) Pollination and seed dispersal of Brazilian Myrtaceae. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 29, 509530.10.1590/S0100-84042006000400002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2024) IBGE Cidades e Estados. ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/rj.html [accessed July 2024].Google Scholar
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (version 3.1). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-2001-001-2nd.pdf [accessed August 2023].Google Scholar
IUCN (2024) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 16. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed July 2024].Google Scholar
Kiaerskou, H. (1893) Enumeratio myrtacearum brasiliensium quas collegiunt Glaziou, Lund, Mendonça, Raben, Reinhardt, Schenck, Warming alique. In Symbolarum ad floram Brasiliae Centralis cognoscendam, particular 39 (ed. Warming, E.), pp. 1199. J. Gjellerup, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Long, B. & Rodríguez, J.P. (2022) Lost but not forgotten: a new nomenclature to support a call to rediscover and conserve lost species. Oryx, 56, 481482.10.1017/S0030605322000618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, E.J. & Bünger, M.O. (2015) Myrtaceae in the Atlantic Forest: their role as a ‘model’ group. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 21652180.10.1007/s10531-015-0992-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray-Smith, C., Brummitt, N.A., Oliveira-Filho, A.T., Bachman, S., Moat, J., Nic Lughadha, E.M. & Lucas, E.J. (2009) Plant diversity hotspots in the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil. Conservation Biology, 23, 151163.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01075.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizo, M.A. (2000) The seed-dispersers and fruit syndromes of Myrtaceae in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. In Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation (eds Levey, D.J., Silva, W.R. & Galetti, M.), pp. 129143. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
POWO (2024) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. powo.science.kew.org [accessed May 2024].Google Scholar
Rivers, M.C., Taylor, L., Brummitt, N.A., Meagher, T.R., Roberts, D.L. & Lughadha, E.N. (2011) How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biological Conservation, 144, 25412547.10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M.F., Amorim, B.S., Burton, G.P., Fernandes, T., Gaem, P.H., Lourenço, A.R.L. et al. (2020) Myrcia. In Flora do Brasil 2020. Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/FB10660 [accessed August 2023].Google Scholar
SEA (Secretaria de Estado do Ambiente) & INEA (Instituto Estadual do Ambiente) (2015) Plano de Manejo (Fase 1) – Parque Estadual da Serra da Tiririca. SEA & INEA, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
SMARHS (Secretaria de Meio Ambiente, Recursos Hídricos e Sustentabilidade) (2021) Plano de Manejo do Parque Natural Municipal de Niterói. SMARHS, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Staggemeier, V.G., Cazetta, E. & Morellato, L.P.C. (2017) Hyperdominance in fruit production in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest: the functional role of plants in sustaining frugivores. Biotropica, 49, 7182.10.1111/btp.12358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiers, B. (2024) Index Herbariorum. A Worldwide Index of Herbaria and Associated Staff where Plant and Fungal Specimens are Permanently Housed. New York Botanical Garden, New York, USA. sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih [accessed May 2024].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig 1. Location of historical and current occurrence records of Myrcia colpodes and M. rubiginosa. The inset map shows the location of the main map in south-eastern Brazil. ES, Espírito Santo; MG, Minas Gerais; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; SP, São Paulo.

Figure 1

Plate 1 (a–d) Myrcia colpodes and (e–h) Myrcia rubiginosa in their natural habitat: (a), (e) trunk; (b), (f) young shoots; (c), (g) flowering branch with a flower highlighted; (d), (h) fruiting branch with a fruit highlighted. Photos: (a,b,d-h) Thiago Fernandes, (c) Carlos Ferreira.