Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-2hk6m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T05:27:25.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Retrospective on Sound Space and Its Rhizomatic Genealogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2025

Sofía Balbontín Open the ORCID record for Sofía Balbontín [Opens in a new window]  and
Mathias Klenner
Sofía Balbontín*
Affiliation:
Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Animation, Design & Construction, Universidad de las Américas UDLA, Santiago, Chile; CIEBA – Centre for Studies & Research in Fine Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Mathias Klenner
Affiliation:
Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Animation, Design & Construction, Universidad de las Américas UDLA, Santiago, Chile; Department of Visual Arts & Design, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Barcelona, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Sofía Balbontín; Email: maria@sofiabalbontin.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The notion of sound space emerges as a multifaceted exploration within the music, artistic and architectural realms, delving into its evolution from a musical object to a transdisciplinary aesthetic event. Rooted in the interplay of sound and space, the term defies strict definition, reflecting a dynamic amalgamation of interpretations throughout its historical practices and conceptualisations. This article engages with different perspectives on the subject of sound space, bringing together a group of architects, sound engineers, artists and researchers – all of them dedicated to sound – to discuss the sensitive experience of listening to space, within material, and/or dematerialised realities. The methodology was based on a series of interviews, confronting their different points of view, therefore building a compelling retrospective around the subject of study. In this exploration, sound space emerges as a complex entity that transcends traditional boundaries, offering a unique lens through which practitioners redefine architecture, challenge perceptions and engage in a dynamic interplay between sound, space and the listener’s experience. The resulting territory is depicted as a rhizomatic system with diverse temporalities coexisting and influencing the understanding of sound space within phenomenal and material perspectives. It portrays a dynamic and evolving system, celebrating diversity and interaction in a transdisciplinary field.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , First View , pp. 1 - 9
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balbontín, S. 2022. Sound-Space: A Listener’s Creative Outcome through an Acousmatic Performance at the Spatial Sound Institute. Text and Performance Quarterly 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2022.2153910.Google Scholar
Balbontín, S. and Klenner, M. 2021. Espacios resonantes. Escuchar el espacio y habitar el sonido. Revista Nodo 31(15): 51–66.Bayer, F. 1981. De Schonberg a Cage: Essai sur la notion d’espace sonore dans la musique contemporaine. Paris: Editions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Bayle, F. 1991. Mi-lieu. L’espace du son 2, 133–7. www.musiques-recherches.be (accessed 3 January 2024).Google Scholar
Blesser, B. and Salter, L. 2009. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Experiencing Aural Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1999. Le Son. Paris: Éditions Nathan.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2009. Sound Art and the Sonic Unconscious. Organised Sound 14(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771809000041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2018. Sonic Flux. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226543208.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 2005. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Granger, G.-G. 1994. Formes, opérations, objets. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, B. 2015. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781501309106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, B. 1978. Sound: Space. Stuttgart: Hatje Cantz Verlag.Google Scholar
Lucier, A. and Simon, D. 1980. Chambers. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. and Carpenter, E. 1960. Acoustic Space. In McLuhan, M. and Carpenter, E. (eds.) Explorations in Communication. Boston: Beacon Press, 65–70.Google Scholar
Schafer, M. 1991. Acoustic Space. L’espace du son 2, 17–22. www.musiques-recherches.be/fr/edition/la-revue-lien (accessed 3 August 2023).Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-Shapes. Organised Sound (2)2, 107–26. doi: 10.1017/S1355771897009059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 2008. Spatial Experience in Electro-Acoustic Music. L’espace du son 2, 123–6. www.musiques-recherches.be (accessed 3 January 2024).Google Scholar
Stockhausen, K. 1958. Musik im Raum. Melos 25(47), 152–75.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2006. Acoustic Space, Architecture and Acoustic Ecology. International Cross-Disciplinary Conference Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, 8–10 June.Google Scholar