Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T17:44:03.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Estimated Pollution Flows in Agricultural Pollution Control Policy: Implications for Abatement and Policy Instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

James S. Shortle
James S. Shortle*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Flows of water pollutants from agricultural sources are, for all practical purposes, unobservable by direct monitoring. These flows can, however, be estimated using hydrological models. The analysis presented in this paper demonstrates that uncertainty on estimated flows is not neutral with respect to the optimal level and allocation of estimated abatement or with respect to the expected net benefits of alternative pollution control policy instruments. Policy implications are noted.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 277 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Pennsylvania State Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 6958.

References

Adar, Zvi and Griffin, James M. “Uncertainty and the Choice of Pollution Control Instruments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3 (1976):178–188.Google Scholar
Alt, Klaus F. and Heady, Earl. “Economics and the Environment: Impacts of Erosion Restraint on Crop Production in the Iowa River Basin.” CARD Report 75. 1977.Google Scholar
Anderson, Frederik et al. Environmental Improvement Through Economic Incentives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Inc. 1977.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. and Oates, Wallace E. The Theory of Environmental Policy Externalities, Public Outlays, and the Quality of Life. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
Boggess, William et al. “Sediment Damage and Farm Production Costs—A Multiple Objective Analysis.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 2 (July 1980):109–112.Google Scholar
Fishelson, Gideon. “Emission Control Policies Under Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3 (1976):189–197.Google Scholar
Griffin, Ronald and Bromley, Daniel. “Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 3 (1982):547–552.Google Scholar
Kramer, Randall A., McSweeney, William T., and Stavros, Robert W. “Soil Conservation with Uncertain Revenues and Input Supplies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 4 (1983):694–702.Google Scholar
Miranowski, John A. et al. Effect of Agricultural Land Use on Stream Water Quality: Economic Analysis. Draft Final Report, Iowa State Cooperative Agreement No. CR807087-01. 1981.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. “The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Terms of Mean, Variances, and Higher Moments.” Review of Economic Studies 37 (1970):537–542.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert C. and Frohberg, Klaus K. “The Welfare Effects of Erosion Controls, Banning Pesticides, and Limiting Fertilizer Application in the Corn Belt.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (February 1977):25–36.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development. Loading Functions for Assessment of Water Pollution From Nonpoint Sources. (May 1976).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Research Laboratory. Alternative Policies for Controlling Nonpoint Agricultural Sources of Water Pollution. (April 1978).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Research Laboratory. Effectiveness of Soil and Water Conservation Practices for Pollution Control. (October 1979a).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Waste Water Management. Institutional Bases for Control of Nonpoint Source Pollution. (November 1979b).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water and Waste Management. Implementation Status of State 208 Agricultural Programs. (September 1980).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water Program Operations. Report to Congress: Nonpoint Pollution in the U.S. (January 1984).Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. Cleaning Up the Environment: Progress Achieved but Major Unresolved Issues Remain. (July 1982).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin. “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974):477–491.Google Scholar
White, Gilbert B. and Partenheimer, Earl. “Economic Impacts of Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans: Case Studies of Pennsylvania Dairy Farms.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (March/April 1980):76–78.Google Scholar
Wishmeir, Walter and Smith, Dwight. Predicting Rainfall-Erosion Losses—A Guide to Conservation Planning. AH-537. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, December 1978.Google Scholar
Yohe, Gary. “Substitution and the Control of Pollution. A Comparison of Effluent Charges and Quantity Standards Under Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3 (1976):312–324.Google Scholar