Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-v2cwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-21T12:29:36.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of Firm-Varying, Input-Specific Efficiencies in Dairy Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Daniel A. Lass
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Conrado M. Gempesaw II
Affiliation:
Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Food and Resource Economics, College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark
Get access

Extract

Firm-varying production technologies were estimated using random coefficients regression methods for a sample of Massachusetts dairy farms. Results were compared to OLS Cobb-Douglas production function estimates. The random coefficients regression model was found to virtually eliminate conventionally measured firm technical inefficiencies by estimating individual firm technologies and ascribing remaining inefficiencies to specific inputs. Input-specific measures of firm inefficiencies showed hired labor, land, and machinery inputs to be used in excess of efficient levels. Livestock supplies were underutilized by all farms. Efficiencies of feed, crop materials, fuels, and utilities varied, although estimated means were closer to optimal levels.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Published as Miscellaneous Paper no. 1446 of the Delaware Experiment Station. Comments of the editor and two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Dr. P.A.V.B. Swamy, Federal Reserve Board, for allowing us to use the SWAMSLEY program. This research was partially supported by USDA-ERS cooperative agreement no. 43-3AEM-0-80062.

References

Aigner, D.K., Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, P.J.Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6 (1977):2137.10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Ureta, B.E.Nonparametric Measures of Technical Efficiency in Milk Production.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 12 (1983):6976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Ureta, B.E., and Rieger, L.Dairy Farm Efficiency Measurement Using Stochastic Frontiers and Neoclassical Duality.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991):421–28.10.2307/1242726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P.J., and White, B.The Post-Quota Performance of Dairy Farms in England and Wales.” Applied Economics 22 (1990):13991406.10.1080/00036849000000110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, N.E., Morzuch, B., and Lass, D.Estimation of Farm Land Values in Massachusetts: Fiscal Year 1990.” Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Fisher, F.The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions.” Econometrica 37 (1969):553–77.10.2307/1910434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontier Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 13 (1980):2756.10.1016/0304-4076(80)90041-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.Estimates of the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function from Cross-Sectional Data.” Journal of Farm Economics 45 (1963):419–28.10.2307/1235997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisley, W., and Mascarenhas, J.Operating Cost Efficiency on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 14 (1985):8895.10.1017/S0899367X00000817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, C., and Houck, J.P.Some Estimators for a Linear Model with Random Coefficients.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (1968):584–95.10.1080/01621459.1968.11009277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, W.D.Allocation Efficiency in a Traditional Indian Agriculture.” Journal of Farm Economics 47 (1965):611–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, R.E., Zilberman, D., and Hochman, E.Estimation of Multicrop Production Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983):770–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, R.J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: A Reconsideration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 96 (1981):477503.10.2307/1882683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, L.J., and Yotopoulos, P.A.A Test of Relative Efficiency and Application to Indian Agriculture.” American Economic Review 61 (1971):94109.Google Scholar
Luh, Y.H., and Stefanou, S.E.Dairy Supply and Factor Demand Response to Output Price Risk: An Econometric Assessment.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18 (1989):103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeusen, W., and van den Broeck, J.Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review 18 (1977):435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimham, G.V.L., Swamy, P.A.V.B., and Reed, R.C.Productivity Analysis of U.S. Manufacturing Using a Stochastic-Coefficients Production Function.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 6 (1988):339–49.10.1080/07350015.1988.10509671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahota, G.S.Efficiency of Resource Allocation in Indian Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 (1968):584605.10.2307/1238261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanou, S.E., and Saxena, S.Education, Experience, and Allocative Efficiency: A Dual Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G.J.The Xistence of X-Efficiency.” American Economic Review 66 (1976):213–16.Google Scholar
Swamy, P.A.V.B., and Tinsley, P.Linear Prediction and Estimation Methods for Regression Models with Stationary Stochastic Coefficients.” Journal of Econometrics 12 (1980):103–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, P.A.V.B., Conway, R., and von zur Muehlen, P.The Foundations of Econometrics—Are There Any?Econometric Reviews 4 (1985):161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauer, L.W., and Belbase, K.P.Technical Efficiency of New York Dairy Farms.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 16 (1987):1016.10.1017/S0899367X00000313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R.D., and Lass, D.A.Comer Solutions in Duality Models: A Cross-Section Analysis of Dairy Production Decisions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1989):1025–40.10.2307/1242679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (1980):817–38.10.2307/1912934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yotopoulos, P.A., and Lau, L.J.A Test for Relative Economic Efficiency: Some Further Results.” American Economic Review 63 (1973):214–23.Google Scholar
Zellner, A.On the Aggregation Problem: A New Approach to a Troublesome Problem.” In Economic Models, Estimation and Risk Programming: Essays in Honor of Gerhard Tintner, edited by Fox, K.A., Sengupta, J.K., and Narasimham, G.V.L. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar
Zellner, A., Kmenta, J., and Dreze, J.Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models.” Econometrica 34 (1966):784–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar