Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T14:53:09.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pronoun Resolution in Unrestricted Text

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kari Fraurud
Kari Fraurud
Affiliation:
Kari Fraurud, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative studies of referential relations in unrestricted natural text are necessary both for a better theoretical understanding of referential processes, and for the development of empirically well-founded algorithms for anaphora resolution in the framework of natural language processing (NLP) systems. The aim of the study reported in this paper was to provide preliminary empirical data on anaphoric pronouns in Swedish. The relation between the pronoun and its antecedent was studied for 600 pronouns in three different types of unrestricted written Swedish text, and a simple pronoun resolution algorithm was tested on the sample.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 1-2 , June 1988 , pp. 47 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brodda, B. 1975. Har genitiven någon grundbetydelse? In Nionde sammankomsten för svenskans beskrivning, Göteborg, 18–19 10 1975.Google Scholar
Fraurud, K. 1986. The Introduction and Maintenance of Discourse Referents. In Dahl, (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Stockholm, 01 9–11, 1986, pp. 111–122.Google Scholar
Fraurud, K. 1988. Hierarchical Relations between Discourse Referents and the Interpretation of Antecedentless Definite Noun Phrases. In Dyvik, (ed.), Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Bergen, 06 11–13, 1987 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Guentner, F. & Lehman, H. 1983. Rules for Pronominalization. In COLING-83 Proceedings from the 9th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 144–151.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. 1977. The Representation and Use of Focus in a System for Understanding Dialogues. In Proceedings from the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 67–76, Los Altos William Kaufmann, Inc., 1977. Reprinted in Grosz, B. J., Sparck, Jones K. & Webber, B. L. (eds.) (1986), pp. 353–363.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J., Sparck, Jones K. & Webber, B. L. (eds.) 1986. Readings in Natural Language Understanding. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A. & Karlsson, F. 1980. Finnish Syntax in Text: Methodology and Some Results of a Quantitative Study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3, 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellberg, S. 1984. Satsens subjekt och textens. Nysvenska studier 64, 107–160.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. 1978. Resolving Pronoun References. In Lingua 44 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Grosz, B. J., Sparck, Jones K. & Webber, B. L. (eds.) (1986), pp. 339–353.Google Scholar
Källgren, G. 1984. Automatisk excerpering av substantiv ur löpande text — Ett möjligt hjälpmedel vid datoriserad indexering? Report 1984:1. IRI, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Källgren, G. 1988. What Good is Syntactic Information in the Lexicon of a Syntactic Parser? In De Nordiska Datalingvistikdagarna 1987 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Reichman, R. 1981. Plain Speaking: A Theory and Grammar of Spontaneous Discourse. Technical Report No. 4681, Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sidner, C. L. 1979. Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. Ph.D. thesis. Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Tingbjörn, G. 1979. Kontrastiv minigrammatik. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Svenska i invandrarperspektiv. Lund: Liber.Google Scholar
Webber, B. L. 1978. A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. New York: Garland Publ.Google Scholar
Wellander, E. 1973. Riktig Svenska. Stockholm: Esselte Studium.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. 1973. A Procedural Model of Language Understanding. In Schank, R. & Colby, K. (eds.) 1978. Computer Models of Thought and Language. New York: W. H. Freeman. Reprinted in Grosz, B. J., Sparck, Jones K. & Webber, B. L. (eds.) (1986).Google Scholar