Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T10:59:24.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Object shift in Scandinavian languages: The impact of contrasted elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2013

Maia Andréasson
Maia Andréasson*
Affiliation:
Department of Swedish, University of Gothenburg, Box 200, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. maia.andreasson@svenska.gu.se
Get access

Abstract

This paper argues for a unified analysis of mainland Scandinavian pronominal object shift and Icelandic full NP shift. Building on data showing the impact of accessibility on object placement in Swedish, Danish and Icelandic, I propose an Optimality Theoretic analysis where semantic/pragmatic constraints involving accessibility, information structure and contrast interact, but are ranked lower than syntactic constraints on, for example, verb placement. Finally, the impact of prosody on pronominal object shift is discussed.

Keywords

contrastDanishIcelandicinformation structureobject shiftOptimality TheoryScandinavianSwedish

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 36 , Special Issue 2: Object Shift in the Nordic Languages , October 2013 , pp. 187 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderssen, Merete & Bentzen, Kristine. 2012. Norwegian object shift as IP-internal topicalization. In Kristine Bentzen & Antonio Fábregas (eds.), The Grammar of Objects, special issue of Nordlyd 39 (1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andréasson, Maia. 2007a. Satsadverbial, ledföljd och informationsdynamik i svenskan (Göteborgsstudier i nordisk språkvetenskap 7). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
Andréasson, Maia. 2007b. The architecture of i-structure. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference, 26–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Andréasson, Maia. 2008. Not all objects are born alike: Accessibility as a key to pronominal object shift in Swedish and Danish. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference, 26–45. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Andréasson, Maia. 2009. Pronominal object shift – not just a matter of shifting or not. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 1–20.Google Scholar
Andréasson, Maia. 2010. Object shift or object placement in general. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference, 26–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24 (1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1991. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 16 (5), 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Sanders, Ted, Schliperoord, Joost & Spooren, Wilbert (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine, Anderssen, Merete & Waldmann, Christian. 2013. Object shift in spoken Mainland Scandinavian: A corpus study of Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 115–151. [This issue]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Engdahl, Elisabet & Andréasson, Maia. 2003. Subject and object positions in Swedish. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG03 Conference, 43–58. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2000. Against feature strength: The case of Scandinavian object shift. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18, 673–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Hye-Won. 1999. Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27 (3), 391–444.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics 34). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15, 369–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly & Jelinek, Eloise. 1993. The syntax and semantics of object shift. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 51, 1–54.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet, Andréasson, Maia & Börjars, Kersti. 2004. Word order in the Swedish midfield – an OT approach. In Fred Karlsson (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/kielitiede/20scl/Engdahl.pdf.Google Scholar
Engels, Eva. 2012. Optimizing Adverb Positions (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Eva & Vikner, Sten. 2013. Scandinavian object shift, remnant VP-topicalisation, verb particles and causatives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 219–244. [This issue]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbacz, Piotr. 2010. Word Order in Övdalian: A Study in Variation and Change (Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A70). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. 2010. Reference and accessibility from a Givenness Hierarchy perspective. International Review of Pragmatics 2, 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Borthen, Kaja & Fretheim, Thorstein. 1999. The role of context in pronominal reference to higher order entities in English and Norwegian. In Bouquet, Paolo, Serafini, Luiciano, Brézillon, Patrick, Benerecetti, Massimo & Castellani, Francesco (eds.), Proceedings from the Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT '99 (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1688), 475–478. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69 (2), 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hegarty, Michael & Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, Michael, Gundel, Jeanette & Borthen, Kaja. 2002. Information structure and the accessibility of clausally introduced referents. Theoretical Linguistics 27, 1–24.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars & Platzack, Christer. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian languages: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 56, 47–69.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Henrik. 2000. Begrebet “klisis” og dets anvendelse på analysen af de danske letled In Kristensen, Kjeld T. (ed.), Studier i Nordisk 1998–1999, 37–50. København: Selskab for Nordisk Filologi.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1992. Object shift and weak pronominals in Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 52, 1–28.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2003. Four myths about object shift in Swedish – and the truth. . . In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög & Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. (eds.), Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, vol. II, 199–207. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2010. Object shift and optionality: An intricate interplay between syntax, prosody and information structure. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine. 2001. An introduction to Optimality Theory in syntax. In Legendre et al. (eds.), 1–27.Google Scholar
Legendre, Geraldine, Grimshaw, Jane B. & Vikner, Sten (eds.). 2001. Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Robert. 2006. Information Structure in Lexical-Functional Grammar: The Discourse–Prosody Correspondence in English and Serbo-Croatian. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Ørsnes, Bjarne. 2013. VP-anaphors and object shift: What do VP-anaphors reveal about the licensing conditions for object shift in Danish? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 245–274. [This issue]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Karen. 1993. Letledsreglen og lighedsreglen. Novation, ekspansion og resistens. In Kristensen, Kjeld (ed.), Jyske studier tilegnede Magda Nyberg og Bent Jul Nielsen, 199–218. København: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats, 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2001a. Introduction. In Sells, Peter (ed.), Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax, 1–16. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2001b. Structure, Alignment and Optimality in Swedish. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Subject positions and the placement of adverbials. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), Subject, Predicates and the EPP, 199–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 148–202. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2013. Full NP object shift: The Old Norse Puzzle and the Faroese Puzzle revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 153–186. [This issue]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Engdahl, Elisabet. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34 (3), 459–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1994. Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling. In Corver, Norbert & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling: Movement and Non-movement Approaches to Free Word Order Phenomena, 487–517. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997. The interpretation of object shift, Optimality Theory, and Minimalism. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60, 1–24.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 2001. V-to-I movement and do-insertion in Optimality Theory. In Legendre et al. (eds.), 427–464.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 2005. Object shift. In van Riemsdijk, Henk & Everaert, Martin (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. III, 392–436. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar