Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:33:02.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Kersti Börjars
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Introduction
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 1999 , pp. 103 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aissen, J. (forthcoming). Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Draft version available at http://ling.ucsc.edu/~aissen/Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. 1997. Optimality Theory: An Introduction to Linguistics in the 1990s. InGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds), Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–32.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D., Langendoen, D. T. (eds) 1997. Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M., Pesetsky, D. (eds) 1997. Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, J. N., Walsh Dickey, L., Urbanzyk, S. (eds) 1995. Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA UMass.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (forthcoming). Optimal Syntax. In Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F. & van de Weijer, J. (eds), Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F., van de Weijer, J. (eds) (forthcoming). Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1997. Projection, Heads and Optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 373–422.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1998. Constraints on Constraints. Manuscript, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., Prince, A. S. 1993. Generalized Agreement. In Booij, G. & van Marie, J. (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1993. Boston: Kluwer, 79–153.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., Prince, A. S. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. In Beckman, J. N., Walsh Dickey, L. & Urbanzyk, S. (eds), Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA Umass, 249–384.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. (forthcoming). Change, Chance and Optimality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Russell, K. 1997. Optimality Theory and Morphology. In Archangeli, D. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds), Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell, 102–133.Google Scholar
Sells, P. 1998. Scandinavian Clause Structure and Object. In Butt, M. & King, T. H. (eds), Proceedings of LFG-98. Stanford: CSLI Publications, Speas, M. 1997. Optimality Theory and Syntax: Null Pronouns and Control. In Archangeli, D. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds), Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell, 171–199.Google Scholar