Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T03:31:20.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

E. Örücü, Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition, Preadvies Nederlandse Vereniging voor Rechtsvergelijking, No. 59 [Preliminary Report for the Dutch Association of Comparative Law], Kluwer, Deventer1999, 133 pp.

Review products

E. Örücü, Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition, Preadvies Nederlandse Vereniging voor Rechtsvergelijking, No. 59 [Preliminary Report for the Dutch Association of Comparative Law], Kluwer, Deventer1999, 133 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

J.M. Smits
J.M. Smits
Affiliation:
Professor of European Private Law, Maastricht University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , May 2001 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (Edingburgh, Scottish Academic Press 1974, 2nd edn. London, University of Georgia Press 1993).Google Scholar

2. Idem, at p. 94.

3. For Watson's reply to Legrand on this point see Watson, A., Legal Transplants and European Private Law (Maastricht, Metro 2000).Google Scholar

4. [1996] 2 WLR 367.

5. Legrand, P., ‘Against a European Civil Code’, 60 Modern Law Review (1997) p. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. McGregor, H., Contract Code (Milano, Giuflre 1993).Google Scholar

7. For a report of the discussion see Busch, D., in Geschriften Nederlandse Vereniging voor Rechtsvergelijking, No. 60 (Deventer, Kluwer 2000) pp. 213 et seq.Google Scholar