Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:20:52.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADAM SMITH, COLONIALISM, AND LIBERAL IMPERIALISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

David Williams
David Williams*
Affiliation:
School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
*
Email: david.williams@qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adam Smith had a longstanding interest in colonialism and more generally relations between Europe and the rest of the world. It was through engagement with these issues that he worked through some of the central elements of his thought. This paper examines both Smith’s contexts and our own and argues that Smith’s work provides an important resource for reflecting today on relations with distant and diverse others today. It identifies three aspects of Smith’s thought that are particularly relevant: the political and economic costs of colonial ventures to the colonisers themselves, the question of whether and how imperialism had encouraged ‘progress’, and the question of how social and cultural differences should be understood and judged. The paper teases out Smith’s sometimes uncertain arguments in these areas and suggests that they can contribute to our own reflections on the troubled practices of liberal imperialism.

Keywords

Adam Smithcolonialismliberal imperialismprogresscultural differenceB12B31F54H10
Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 265: Special issue: "ADAM SMITH@300" , Autumn 2023 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute Economic Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvey, J. (2004), ‘The role of teleology in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations’, History of Economics Review, 40, 1, pp. 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaney, D. and Inayatullah, I. (2009), Savage Economics: Wealth, Poverty and the Temporal Walls of Capitalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, V. (1997), ‘“Mere inventions of the imagination”: A survey of recent literature on Adam Smith’, Economics and Philosophy, 13, 2, pp. 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. (1971), Adam Smith’s Science of Morals, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cobden, R. (1835), England, Ireland, and America, London: James Ridgway.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, S. (2017), ‘Adam Smith on savages’, Revue de Philosophie Economique, 18, 1, pp. 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, T. (1990), Tobacco Lord: A Study of the Tobacco Merchants of Glasgow and their Trading Activities, 1740-90, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbons, A. (1995), Adam Smith’s System of Liberty, Wealth and Virtue: The Moral and Political Foundations of The Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (1999), A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgement and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2011), ‘Adam Smith and cultural relativism’, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 4, 2, pp. 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golemboski, D. (2018), ‘The impartiality of Smith’s impartial spectator: The problem of parochialism and the possibility of social critique’, European Journal of Political Theory, 17, 2, pp. 174–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C. (1999), Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (1981), The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (1996), Natural Law and Moral Philosophy from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. (2010), Scotland, the Caribbean and the Atlantic World, 1750-1820, Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkin, M. (2005), ‘Adam Smith’s missing history: Primitives, progress, and problems of genre,’ ELH, 72, 2, pp. 429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2012), The French Enlightenment and its Others: The Mandarin, The Savage and the Invention of the Human Sciences, London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. (2001), ‘The hidden theology of Adam Smith’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8, 1, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. (2009), ‘Adam Smith in war (and peace)’, in Hall, I. and Hill, L. (eds.), British International Thinkers from Hobbes to Namier, London: Palgrave, pp.71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. (2012), ‘Adam Smith: The man, the mind, and the troubled soul’, Review of Politics, 74, 2, pp. 307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, S. (2022), The Glasgow Sugar Aristocracy: Scotland and Caribbean Slavery, 1775-1838, London: University of London Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthu, S. (2008), ‘Adam Smith’s critique of international trading companies: Theorizing “globalization” in the age of enlightenment’, Political Theory, 26, 2, pp. 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, J. (1909), A Project of Empire: A Critical Study of the Economics of Imperialism with Special Reference to the Ideas of Adam Smith, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pack, S. (1996), ‘Slavery, Adam Smith’s vision and the invisible hand’, History of Economic Ideas, 4, (1/2), pp. 253–69.Google Scholar
Palen, M. (2014), ‘Adam Smith as advocate of empire, c. 1870-1932’, The Historical Journal, 57, 1, pp. 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, N. (2010), Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Pitts, J. (2005), A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, E. (2012), ‘Adam Smith in the British Empire’, in Muthu, S. (ed), Empire and Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 184–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. (2012), The Making of Modern Liberalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, S. (1992), ‘Adam Smith on feudalism, commerce and slavery’, History of Political Thought, 13, 2, pp. 219–41.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1969), ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 8, 1, pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1975), in Macfie, A.L. and Raphael, D.D. (eds), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Abbreviated as Smith 1975.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1976), in Campbell, R.H. and Skinner, A.S. (eds), An Inquiry into the Nature Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Abbreviated as Smith 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1977), in Skinner, A.S. and Wilson, T. (eds), Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Abbreviated as Smith 1977.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1978), in Meek, R.L., Raphael, D.D. and Stein, P.G. (eds), Lectures on Jurisprudence, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Abbreviated as Smith 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1980), in Wightman, W.P.D. (ed), Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Abbreviated as Smith 1980.Google Scholar
Stewart-Robertson, J. and Norton, D. (1984), ‘Thomas Reid on Adam Smith’s theory of morals’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 45, 2, pp. 317–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. (2020), Progress, Pluralism and Politics: Liberalism and Colonialism, Past and Present, Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. (1965), Classical Political Economy and Colonies, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Winch, D. (1978), Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographical Revision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt-Walter, A. (1996), ‘Adam Smith and the liberal tradition in international relations’, Review of International Studies, 22, 1, pp. 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar