Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-42qgm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:45:49.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strain Rate Effects in Porous Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Lankford Jr.  and
K. A. Dannemann
J. Lankford Jr.
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238–5166
K. A. Dannemann
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238–5166
Get access

Abstract

The behavior of metal foams under rapid loading conditions is assessed. Dynamic loading experiments were conducted in our laboratory using a split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus and a drop weight tester; strain rates ranged from 45 s−1 to 1200 s−1. The implications of these experiments on open-cell, porous metals, and closed- and open-cell polymer foams are described. It is shown that there are two possible strain-rate dependent contributors to the impact resistance of cellular metals: (i) elastic-plastic resistance of the cellular metal “skeleton,” and (ii) the gas pressure generated by gas flow within distorted open cells. A theoretical basis for these implications is presented.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 521: Symposium R – Porous & Cellular Materials for Structural Applications , 1998 , 103
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Gibson, L. J. and Ashby, M. F., Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2 nd edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Sugimara, Y., Meyer, J., He, M. Y., Bart-Smith, H., Grenestedt, J., and Evans, A. G., On the Mechanical Performance of Closed Cell Al Alloy Foams, Proc. Ultralight Materials Conference, 1–33, July 1997.Google Scholar
3. Zhang, J. and Ashby, M. F., CPGS Thesis, Engineering Depart., 1986.Google Scholar
4. Tyler, C. J. and Ashby, M. F., Project Report, Cambridge University Engineering Dept., 1986.Google Scholar
5. Rinde, J. A. and Hoge, K. G., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 15, 1377, 1971.Google Scholar
6. Nagy, A., Ko, W. L., and Lindholm, U. S., Mechanical Behavior of Foamed Materials Under Dynamic Compression, J. Cellular Plastics, 10, 1–8, 1974.Google Scholar
7. Lankford, J., Compressive Failure of Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Buckling, Kinking, and the Role of the Interphase, Journal of Materials Science, 30, 4343–4348, 1995.Google Scholar
8. Reddy, T. Y., Reid, S. R., and Barr, R., Int. J. Impact Engrg., 11, No. 4, 463–480, 1991.Google Scholar
9. Liber, T. and Epstein, H., The Effect of Airflow on the Behavior of Foam as a Dynamic Element in Shock and Vibrations, ASME Paper No. 69-VIBR-46, 1969.Google Scholar
10. Tsai, J. T., The Compressive Deformation of Polymeric Foams, Polymer Engineering and Science, 22, 545–548, 1982.Google Scholar
11. Ozgur, M., Mullen, R. L., and Welsch, G., Analysis of Closed Cell Metal Composites, Acta Mater. 44, 2115–2126, 1996.Google Scholar