Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T00:20:19.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spectroscopy of Iron Germanium Sulfide Open-Framework Materials and Precursors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Scott J. Kirkby  and
Geoffrey A. Ozin
Scott J. Kirkby
Affiliation:
Materials Chemistry Research Group, Lash Miller Chemical Laboratories, University of Toronto, 80 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1
Geoffrey A. Ozin
Affiliation:
Materials Chemistry Research Group, Lash Miller Chemical Laboratories, University of Toronto, 80 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A1
Get access

Abstract

The electronic and vibrational spectroscopy of one family of metal germanium sulfide open-framework materials, designated Cat2FeGe4S10 (Cat = (CH 3)4N, Cs), along with their precursor Cat4Ge4S10 germanium sulfide clusters have been studied. Ultraviolet-visible and midinfrared reflectance spectroscopy has been used to study the electronic states. The reflectance spectroscopy of the frameworks is dominated by the d-d transitions of the Fe(II) in a S4 symmetry site. The vibrational spectroscopy has been analyzed by Fourier transform Raman. The frameworks are weakly vibrationally coupled. Their spectra contain vibrational modes that are nearly identical in frequency to those of the isolated cluster. There is a fortuitous window in the cluster vibrations in which framework modes of the Fe(II) center can be observed. In addition computational methods have been used to model the experimental results.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 431: Symposium P – Microporous and Macroporous Materials , 1996 , 165
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bedard, R. L., Vail, L. D., Wilson, S. T. and Flanigen, E. M. (UOP), U.S. Patent No. 4,880,761, 1989.Google Scholar
2. Bedard, R. L., Vail, L. D., Wilson, S. T. and Flanigen, E. M.(UOP), U.S. Patent No. 4,933,068, 1990.Google Scholar
3. Yaghi, O. M., Sun, Z., Richardson, D. A. and Groy, T. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, p.807, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Yaghi, O. M., Richardson, D. A., Li, G., Davis, C. E. and Groy, T. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 371, p.15, 1995.Google Scholar
5. Bowes, C. L., Lough, A. J., Malek, A., Ozin, G. A., Petrov, S., and Young, D., Chem. Ber., 129, p. 283, 1996.Google Scholar
6. Holmes, A. J., Kirkby, S., Ozin, G. A. and Young, D., J. Phys. Chem., 98, p. 4677, 1994.Google Scholar
7. Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Head-Gordon, M., et. al., Gaussian92, Revision C, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1992.Google Scholar
8. Burdett, J. K., Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 21, p.113, 1978.Google Scholar