Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:02:35.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation of Microstructural Evolution during Superplastic Deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B.-N. Kim  and
K. Hiraga
B.-N. Kim
Affiliation:
National Research institute for Metals, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
K. Hiraga
Affiliation:
National Research institute for Metals, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Superplastic tensile deformation is simulated in 2 dimensions by incorporating grain boundary diffusion and concurrent grain growth derived from static and dynamic growth mechanisms. The following relationship is found between microstructural changes and deformation behavior for constant stress conditions. Grain boundary diffusion produces an increase in the aspect ratio of the matrix grains during deformation and the increased aspect ratio causes a change in creep rate parameters: the stress exponent is decreased from the initial value of 1.0 for equiaxed grains and the grain size exponent is increased from the initial value of 3.0. Accelerated grain growth is also found by the present simulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 601: Symposium HH – Superplasticity-Current Status & Future Potential , 1999 , 187
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lihshitz, I.M., Soviet Phys. JETP 17, 909 (1963).Google Scholar
2. Kim, B.-N. and Kishi, T., J. Japan Inst. Metals 61, 1341 (1997).10.2320/jinstmet1952.61.12_1341Google Scholar
3. Kim, B.-N., Hiraga, K., Sakka, Y and Ahn, B.-W., Acta Mater. 41, 3433 (1999).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00201-3Google Scholar
4. Stevens, R.N., Phil. Mag. 23, 265 (1971).10.1080/14786437108216383Google Scholar
5. Coble, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1679 (1963).10.1063/1.1702656Google Scholar
6. Ashby, M.F., Edward, G.H., Davenport, J. and Verrall, R.A., Acta Metall. 26, 1379 (1978).10.1016/0001-6160(78)90153-0Google Scholar
7. Spingarn, J.R. and Nix, W.D., Acta Metall. 26, 1389 (1978).10.1016/0001-6160(78)90154-2Google Scholar
8. Ashby, M.F. and Verrall, R.A., Acta Metall. 21, 149 (1973).10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6Google Scholar