Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-21T10:04:15.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simfuel Dissolution Studies in Granitic Groundwater at 25°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Amaia Sandino ,
I. Casas ,
K. Ollila  and
J. Bruno
Amaia Sandino
Affiliation:
KTH, Dept. of Inorganic Chemistry, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
I. Casas
Affiliation:
MBT Tecnologia Ambiental, E-08290 Cerdanyola, Spain
K. Ollila
Affiliation:
VTT Tech. Research Centre of Finland, Otakaari 3A, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland
J. Bruno
Affiliation:
MBT Tecnologia Ambiental, E-08290 Cerdanyola, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution of a non-radioactive chemical analogue of spent nuclear fuel (SIMFUEL) has been studied as a function of two different synthetic groundwaters at 25°C. The cumulative release of U, Mo, Ba, Y and Sr is presented after 170 days of total leaching time.

The results obtained show the potential usefulness of SIMFUEL to ascertain the kinetics and mechanisms of dissolution of the minor components of spent fuel. In the case of Sr, a good correlation is found with the dissolution of this minor component measured in spent fuel leaching experiments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 221
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Werme, L.O. and Forsyth, R.S., “The SKB spent fuel corrosion programme Status report 1988”, SKB Technical Report 89–14 (1989)Google Scholar
[2] Werme, L., Sellin, P. and Forsyth, R.S., “Radiolytically induced oxidative dissolution of spent nuclear fuel”, SKB Technical Report 90–08 (1990)Google Scholar
[3] Grambow, B., Werme, L.O., Forsyth, R.S. and Bruno, J., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 176, (Materials Research Society, 1990) pp. 465–474 Google Scholar
[4] Lucuta, P.G., Palmer, B.J.F., Matzke, H. and Hartwig, D.S.; Proc. 2nd. International Conference on CANDU fuel, Canadian Nuclear Society, ed. Hastings, I.J. (1989)Google Scholar
[5] Vandergraaf, T.T., “Leaching of Irradiated LWR Fuel”, TR-100, Atomic Energy of Canada (1980)Google Scholar
[6] Katayama, Y.B., “Leaching of Irradiated LWR Fuel Pellets in Deionized and Typical Groundwater”, Battelle Pacific Northwest Lab. Report, BNWL-2057 (1976)Google Scholar
[7] Norris, A.E., “Status Report Concerning Empirical Measurements of Fission Product Release from Nuclear Reactor Spent Fuel”, ONWI/Sub/79/ES11-01200-11 (1979)Google Scholar
[8] Eklund, U.B. and Forsyth, R.S., “Leaching of Irradiated UO2 Fuel”, KBS Report 70 (AECL-tr-MISC-456) (1978)Google Scholar
[9] Forsyth, R.S., Werme, L.O. and Bruno, J., J. of Nucl. Mat. 138 (1986) pp. 1–15 Google Scholar
[10] Bruno, J., Casas, I. and Puigdomenech, I., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. In press.Google Scholar
[11] Torrero, E., Casas, I., Aguilar, M., de Pablo, J., Gimenez, J. and Bruno, J.. These proceedings.Google Scholar