Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T09:26:10.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second Order Magneto-Optic Effects in Epitaxial FE(110)/MO(110) Bilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R.M. Osgood ,
R.L. White  and
B.M. Clemens
R.M. Osgood
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
R.L. White
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
B.M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

The signal measured during a Magneto-Optic Kerr Effect (MOKE) experiment is usually assumed to be linear in the magnetization (or the magnitude of the magneto-optic coupling vector Q that is proportional to the magnetization) so that a plot of the magnetization versus applied field can be obtained. We have observed an appreciable contribution from the Q2 term in the magneto-optic response of epitaxial Fe(110)/Mo(110) bilayers. The Q2 term in the magneto-optic response is much larger than that predicted by existing theory. We re-derive and modify the existing theory to fit the Q2 term.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 384: Symposium L – Magnetic Ultrathin films, Multilayers and Surfaces , 1995 , 491
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Bader, S. D., J. Mag. Magnetic Mats., 100, 440 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Voigt, W.. Handbuch der Elektrizitdt und des Magnetismus. (Barth 4:2, Leipzig, 1915).Google Scholar
3. Metzger, G., Pluvinage, P. and Torguet, R., Annales de Physique, 10, 1965, 5.Google Scholar
4. Clemens, B. M., Osgood, R. M., Payne, A. P., Lairson, B. M., Brennan, S., White, R. L., and Nix, W. D., J. Mag. Magnetic Mats., 121, 37 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Osgood, R.M. III, Clemens, B.M., and White, R.L.. Asymmetric magneto-optic response in anisotropic thin films, 1995 (unpublished).Google Scholar
6. Osgood, R. M. III, Clemens, B. M., and White, R. L.. This volume. (Mats. Res. Soc. Proc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), edited by Heinrich, B..Google Scholar
7. Osgood, R.M. III . PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1995.Google Scholar
8. Yariv, A. and Yeh, P.. Optical Waves in Solids. (John Wiley and Sons, 1984).Google Scholar
9. Bolotin, G. A. and Sokolov, A. V., Fiz. Metall. i Metallov., 12, 493,625,785 (1961).Google Scholar
10. Argyres, P. N., Phys. Rev., 97, 334 (1955).Google Scholar