Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T20:37:38.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pu-Bearing Materials - From Fundamental Science To Storage Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shiu-Wing Tam  and
Yung Liu
Shiu-Wing Tam
Affiliation:
tam@anl.gov, Argonne National Laboratory, Decision & Information Sciences Div., 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Bldg. 900, MS-12, Argonne, IL, 60439, United States, 630-252-6602, 630-252-5715
Yung Liu
Affiliation:
yyliu@anl.gov, Argonne National Laboratory, Decision & Information Sciences Div., 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Bldg. 900, MS-12, Argonne, IL, 60439, United States
Get access

Abstract

The behavior of plutonium (Pu) oxides in the presence of water/moisture in a confined space and the associated issues of hydrogen and oxygen generation due to radiolysis have important implications for the storage and transportation of Pu-bearing materials. This paper reviews the results of recent studies of gas generation in the Pu-O-H system, including the determination of release rates via engineering-scale measurement. The observations of the significant differences in gas generation behavior between “pure” Pu-bearing materials and those that contain salt impurities are addressed. In conjunction with the discussion of these empirical observations, the work also addresses recent scientific advances in the investigations of the Pu-O-H system using state-of-the-art ab initio electronic structure calculations, as well as advanced synchrotron techniques to determine the electronic structure of the various Pu-containing phases. The role of oxidizing species such as the hydroxyl radical from the radiolysis of water is examined. Discussed also is the challenge in the predictive ab-initio calculations of the electronic structure of the Pu-H-O system, due to the nature of the 5f valence electrons in Pu. Coupled with the continuing material surveillance program, it is anticipated that this work may help determine the electronic structure of the various Pu-containing phases and the role of impurity salts on gas generation and the long-term stability of oxygen/hydrogen-containing plutonium oxides beyond PuO2.

Keywords

actinideelectronic structurestorage
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1104: Symposium NN – Actinides 2008—Basic Science, Applications and Technology , 2008 , 1104-NN03-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1U.S. Department of Energy, Criteria for Packaging and Storing Uranium-233-bearing Materials, DOE-STD-3028-2000, July 2000.Google Scholar
2U.S. Department of Energy, Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-bearing Materials, DOE-STD-3013-2004, April 2004.Google Scholar
3 Berg, J.M. Harradine, D. Hill, D.D. McFarlan, J.T. Padilla, D.D. Prenger, F.C. Veirs, D.K. and Worl, L.A. Gas Generation over Plutonium Oxides in the 94-1 Shelf Life Surveillance Program, LA-UR-02-0583 (2002).Google Scholar
4 Veirs, D.K. Gas Generation by Pure and Impure Plutonium Dioxide Materials, The Actinide Research Quarterly, 3rd Quarter, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2004.Google Scholar
5 Haschke, J.M. Allen, T.H. and Morales, L.A. Science 287, 285 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Haschke, J.M. and Oversby, V.M. J.Nucl.Mater. 305, 187–201 (2002).Google Scholar
7 Conradson, S.D. Begg, B.D. Clark, D.L. et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13443 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Conradson, S.D. Begg, B.D. Clark, D.L. et al. , Journal of Solid State Chemistry 178, 521–535 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Petit, L. Svane, A. Szotek, Z. and Temmerman, W.M. Science 301, 498 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Prodan, I.D. Scuseria, G.E. Sordo, J.A. Kudin, K.N. and Martin, R.L. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 014703 (2005).10.1063/1.1953427Google Scholar
11 Prodan, I.D. Scuseria, G.E. and Martin, R.L. Phys. Rev. B 73, 045104 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045104Google Scholar
12 Korzhavyi, P.A. Vitos, L. Andersson, D.A. and Johansson, B. Nature Materials 3, 225 (2004).Google Scholar
13 Penneman, R.H. and Paffett, M.T. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 178, 563–566 (2005).Google Scholar
14 Zachariasen, W.H. J. Less-Common Met. 62, 1 (1978).Google Scholar
15 Gouder, T. Seibert, A. Havela, L. and Rebizant, J. Surface Science 601, L77–L80 (2007).Google Scholar
16 Turner, J.E. Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation, Protection, 2nd ed., (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995) p. 386–389.Google Scholar
17 Tam, S.-W., Pandey, R. and Liu, Y. unpublished, 2008.Google Scholar
18 DMol - Cerius/Quantum Chemistry, (MSI, San Diego, 1998).Google Scholar
19 Wu, X. and Ray, A.K. Eur. Phys. J. B19, 345–351 (2001).Google Scholar
20 McNeilly, C.E. J. Nucl. Mat. 11, 53 (1964).Google Scholar
21 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. B48, 13115 (1993).Google Scholar