Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T09:44:47.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Prevalent Whisker Toughening Mechanisms in Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. G. Evans ,
M. Rühle ,
B. J. Daigleish  and
M. D. Thouless
A. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Materials Program, College of Engineering University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106
M. Rühle
Affiliation:
Materials Program, College of Engineering University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106
B. J. Daigleish
Affiliation:
Materials Program, College of Engineering University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106
M. D. Thouless
Affiliation:
Materials Program, College of Engineering University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106
Get access

Abstract

Some aspects of whisker toughening are reviewed. It is shown that several important toughened materials have a toughness dominated by the nonlinear bridging of intact whiskers. Such toughening is demonstrated to depend sensitively on the relative fracture resistance properties of the whiskers, the interface and the matrix. It is also shown that, when the interface fracture resistance is low, the frictional sliding behavior of the previously debonded interface and the whisker strength distribution exert a major influence on toughness, in accordance with pull-out phenomena.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 78: Symposium E – Advances in Structural Ceramics , 1986 , 259
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Faber, K.T. and Evans, A.G., Acta Met., 31 (1983), 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Evans, A.G. and Faber, K.T., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 67 (1984), 255.Google Scholar
3. Evans, A.G. and McMeeking, R.M., Acts Met., 34 (1986), 2435.Google Scholar
4. Rühle, M., Dalgleish, B.J., and Evans, A.G., Scripta Met., in press.Google Scholar
5. Budiansky, B., Micromechanics II, Tenth National Congress of Applied Mechanics, Austin, Texas, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Marshall, D.B. and Cox, B.N., Acta Met., to be published.Google Scholar
7. Evans, A.G., “Ceramic Microstructure: The Role of Interfaces,” (ed. Pask, J.A. and Evans, A.G.), Plenum, NY, (1986), in press.Google Scholar
8. Budiansky, B., Hutchinson, J.W. and Evans, A.G., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2 (1986), 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Evans, A.G., Lu, M.C., Rühle, M. and Schmauder, S., Acta Met., 34 (1986), 1643.Google Scholar
10. Rühle, M. and Mader, W., J. Mater. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
11. Aksay, I., “Ceramic Microstructure: The Role of Interfaces,” (ed. Park, J.A. and Evans, A.G.), Plenum, NY (1986) in press.Google Scholar
12. Budianaky, B., Amazigo, J. and Evans, A.G., to be published.Google Scholar
13. Rose, F.R.G., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, in press.Google Scholar
14. Lawn, B.R. and Wilshaw, T.R., Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge Univ Press (1915).Google Scholar
15. Thouless, M.D and Evans, A.G., Acta Met., to be published.Google Scholar
16. Stewart, R.L., Chyung, K., Taylor, M.P. and Cooper, R.F., Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics (ed. Bradt, R.C., Lange, F.F., Evans, A.G. and Hasselman, D.P.H.), Plenum, NY (1986), Vol.7, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar