Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T08:46:02.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear Optical Response of Conducting Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Weikang Wu  and
Steven Kivelson
Weikang Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794
Steven Kivelson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794
Get access

Abstract

We compute analytic expressions for the nonlinear optical response functions for the Peierls model of a conducting polymer by using the Keldysh non-equilibrium Green's function methods. The only parameter in the model is the gap, which can be determined independently from the linear optical response. Our results for 3rd harmonic generation are in excellent agreement with experiments on polyacetylene. This constitutes strong evidence that polyacetylene is well described by a model of weakly interacting quasi-particles. Further nonlinear optical effects, which should be experimentally observable, are predicted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 109: Symposium K – Nonlinear Optical Properties of Polymers , 1987 , 229
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Lauchlan, L., Etemad, S., Chung, T. C., Heeger, A. J. and McDiamid, A. G., Phys. Rev. B24 3701 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Orenstein, J. and Baker, G. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1043 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Shank, C. V., Yen, R., Fork, R. L., Orenstein, J. and Baker, G. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1660 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Vardeny, Z., Strait, J., Moses, D., Chung, F.-C., Heeger, A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1657 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Vardeny, Z., Ehrenfreund, E. and Brafman, O., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 117 245 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Kivelson, S., Wu, W.-K., Phys. Rev. B34 5423 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kajzar, F., Etemad, S., Baker, G. L. and Messier, J., Synth. Met. 17 563 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Heeger, A. J., Moses, D. and Sinclair, M., Synth. Met. 17 343 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Heeger, A. J., Moses, D. and Sinclair, M., preprint.Google Scholar
[10] Wu, W.-K., Kivelson, S., Phys. Rev. B33 8546 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Peierls, R. E., Quantum Theory of Solids Oxford Univ. Press London, 1955.Google Scholar
[12] Wu, W.-K. and Kivelson, S., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
[13] Keldysh, S. V., Soy. Phys. JEPT. 20 1018 (1965).Google Scholar
[14] Wu, W.-K., Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook (1987)Google Scholar
[15] Takayama, H., Lin-Lin, Y. R.., and Maki, K., Phys. Rev. B21 2388 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Chou, K.-C., Su, Z.-B., Hao, B.-L. and Yu, L., Phys. Rep. 118 1 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar