Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:19:25.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanoscale Twinning and Martensitic Transformation in Shock-Deformed Bcc Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Luke L.M. Hsiung
Luke L.M. Hsiung*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-352, Livermore, CA 94551-9900, USA
Get access

Abstract

Shock-induced twinning and martensitic transformation in BCC-based polycrystalline metals (Ta and U-6wt%Nb) have been observed and studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The length-scale of domain thickness for both twin lamella and martensite phase is found to be smaller than 100 nm. While deformation twinning of {112}<111>-type is found in Ta when shock-deformed at 15 GPa, both twinning and martensitic transformation are found in Ta when shock-deformed at 45 GPa. Similar phenomena of nanoscale twinning and martensitic transformation are also found in U6Nb shock-deformed at 30 GPa. Since both deformation twinning and martensitic transformation occurred along the {211}b planes associated with high resolved shear stresses, it is suggested that both can be regarded as alternative paths for shear transformations to occur in shock-deformed BCC metals. Heterogeneous nucleation mechanisms for shock-induced twinning and martensitic transformation are proposed and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 882: Symposium EE – Linking Length Scales in the Mechanical Behavior of Materials , 2005 , EE4.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Huang, J. C. and Gray, G. T. III, Acta Metall. 37, 3335 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Muff, L. E. Niou, C.-S., Pappu, S.; Rivas, J. M. and Quinones, S. A. Phys. Stat. Solids A. 149, 253 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Murr, L. E. Meyers, M. A. Niou, C.-S., Chen, Y. J. Pappu, S. and Kennedy, C. Acta Mater. 45, 157 (1997).Google Scholar
4 Nesterenko, V. F. Meyers, M. A. LaSalvia, J. C. Bondar, M. P. Chen, Y. J. and Lukyanov, Y. L. Mater. Sci. Eng. A229, 23 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Briant, C. L. Batcheler, R. H. Lassila, D. H. and Gourdin, W. in Tantalum, editedby Chen, et al., p. 191, TMS, Warrendale, PA (1996).Google Scholar
6 Lassila, D. H. and Gray, G. T. III, J. Phys. IV, Colloque C3, 1, C3–19 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Hsiung, L. M. and Lassila, D. H. Acta Mater. 48, 4851 (2000).Google Scholar
8 Sikka, S. K. Vohra, Y. K. and Chidambaram, R. Progr. Mater. Sci. 245 (1982).Google Scholar
9 Banerjee, S. and Cahn, R. W. Acta Metall. 31, 1721 (1983).Google Scholar
10 Bendersky, L. A. Boettinger, W. J. Burton, B. P. and Biancaniello, F. S. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 931 (1990).Google Scholar
11 Young, D. A. Phase Diagrams of the Elements, University of California Press, Berkeley: California, 1991.Google Scholar
12 Tonkov, E. Yu and Ponyatovsky, E. G. Phase Transformations of Elements under High Pressure, CRC Press, 2005.Google Scholar
13 Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J. Theory of Dislocations (2nd edition), J. Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
14 Vitek, V. Crystal Lattice Defects, 5, 1 (1974).Google Scholar