Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T04:08:43.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Properties of Nickel Base Metastable Solid Solutions with Large Size Mismatch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C.L. Tsai  and
B.C. Giessen
C.L. Tsai
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Barnett Institute of Chemical Analysis & Materials Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
B.C. Giessen
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Barnett Institute of Chemical Analysis & Materials Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

Ni-based stable and metastable solid solutions with T3 and T4 transition metals have been prepared by rapid liquid quenching. The microhardnesses of these alloys show a substantial increase (by a factor of 4 to 5) that scales with their size mismatch as well as the solute concentration. It was found that the microhardness increase, ΔH, can be fitted well to the theoretical equation: ΔHv = K μ (cη)4/v3 where μ is the solvent shear modulus, c is the solute concentration and η is the size mismatch. The constant K for Ni base solid solutions is ~85.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 28: Symposium F – Rapidly Solidified Metastable Materials , 1983 , 413
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hume-Rothery, W., Smallman, R.E. and Haworth, C.W., “Structure of Metals and Alloys”, 5th ed. (Institute of Metals, London, 1969).Google Scholar
2. Darken, L.S. and Gurry, R.W., “Physical Chemistry of Metals”, (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1953).Google Scholar
3. Chelikowsky, J.R., Phys. Rev. B19, 686 (1979).10.1103/PhysRevB.19.686Google Scholar
4. Miedema, A.R., deBoer, F.R. and Boom, R., Calphad 1, 341 (1977).10.1016/0364-5916(77)90011-6Google Scholar
5. Alonso, J.A. and Simozar, S., Phys. Rev. B22, 5583 (1980).10.1103/PhysRevB.22.5583Google Scholar
6. Marcus, M.A., Solid State Commun. 38, 251 (1981).10.1016/0038-1098(81)90455-5Google Scholar
7. Marcus, M.A., Tsai, C.L. and Giessen, B.C., Solid State Commun. 46, 455 (1983).10.1016/0038-1098(83)90575-6Google Scholar
8. Lengeler, B. and Eisenberger, P., Phy. Rev. B21, 4507 (1980).10.1103/PhysRevB.21.4507Google Scholar
9. Cohen, R.L., Feldman, L.C., West, K.W. and Kincaid, B.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1416 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1416Google Scholar
10. Cable, J.W., Parra, R.E. and Child, H.R., Solid State Commun. 27, 911 (1978).10.1016/0038-1098(78)90203-XGoogle Scholar
11. Tsai, C.L. and Marcus, M.A. (to be published).Google Scholar
12. Hansen, M., “Constitution of Binary Alloys” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958).10.1149/1.2428700Google Scholar
13. Elliot, R.P., “Constitution of Binary Alloys, First Supplement” (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
14. Shunk, F.A., “Constitution of Binary Alloys, Second Supplement” (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
15. Moffatt, W.G., “Handbook of Binary Phase Diagrams,” (General Electric Co., Schenectady, NY, 1981).Google Scholar
16. Fontaine, A. in “Rapidly Quenched Metals II”, ed. by Grant, N.J. and Giessen, B.C., (Cambridge, MA, M.I.T. Press), p. 163.Google Scholar
17. Sabin, E. and Jones, H. in “Rapidly Quenched Metals III”, ed. by Cantor, B. (The Metal Soc., London), pp 138.Google Scholar
18. Yost, F.G., Metal. Trans. 14A, 947 (1983).10.1007/BF02644301Google Scholar