Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T16:54:20.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magneto-Spectroscopy of Two-Electron Transitions in Homoepitaxial GaN.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

M. Wojdak ,
J.M. Baranowski ,
A. Wysmolck ,
K. Pakula ,
R. Stepnicwski ,
M. Potemski ,
I. Grzegory  and
S. Porowski
M. Wojdak
Affiliation:
Instiute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland
J.M. Baranowski
Affiliation:
Instiute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland
A. Wysmolck
Affiliation:
Instiute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Grenoble High Magnetic Field Laboratory, MPI/FKF-CNRS, BP166X, F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
K. Pakula
Affiliation:
Instiute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland
R. Stepnicwski
Affiliation:
Instiute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Hoza 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland
M. Potemski
Affiliation:
Grenoble High Magnetic Field Laboratory, MPI/FKF-CNRS, BP166X, F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
I. Grzegory
Affiliation:
High Pressure Research Center Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokolowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
S. Porowski
Affiliation:
High Pressure Research Center Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokolowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
Get access

Abstract

Two-electron transition occurs when the exciton bound to a neutral donor (DBE) recombines and leaves the donor in an excited state. The two-electron energy is therefore lower than that of the DBE peak by the difference in ground and excited state of the neutral donor. In a magnetic field the two-electron satellite splits into several components. These intra-donor excitations have been studied in homoepitaxial GaN up to magnetic fields reaching 23T. For Faraday (B‖c) configuration the two-electron transition splits mainly into 2s, 2p0, 2p+ and 2p- components. The total splitting between 2p+ and 2p- is equal to Landau energy. For Voigt (B???c) configuration in addition to transition to 2s, 2p0, 2p- and 2p+ there are additional lines which origin is discussed. It has been found that for two configurations of magnetic field the separation between 2p+ and 2p- is not exactly equal, what indicates the anisotropy of the electron effective mass. It has been found that m| = 0.205m0 and m??? = 0.225m0.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 693 , 2001 , I8.10.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Baranowski, J.M., Liliental-Weber, Z., Korona, K., Pakula, K., Stepniewski, R., Wysmolek, A., Grzegory, I., Nowak, G., Porowski, S., Monemar, B. and Bergman, P., Mater. Res.Soc. Symp. Proc. 349, 393 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Kornitzer, K., Ebner, T., Thonke, K., Sauer, R., Kirchner, C., Schwegler, V., Kamp, M., Leszczynski, M., Grzegory, I. and Porowski, S., Phys. Rev. B60, 1471 (1999)Google Scholar
[3] Hopfield, J.J. and Thomas, D.G. Phys. Rev. 121, 35 (1961)Google Scholar
[4] Skromme, B.J., Zao, H., Goldengerg, B., Kong, H.S., Leonard, M.T., Bulman, G.E., Abernathy, C.R., Perton, S.J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 449, 713 (1997)Google Scholar
[5] Wysmolek, A., Sapega, V.F., Ruf, T., Cardona, M., Potempski, M., Wyder, P., Stepniewski, R., Pakula, K., Baranowski, J.M., Grzegory, I. and Porowski, S., Proc. of Int. Worshop on Nitride Semiconductors 2000, IPAP Conf. Series 1, 579 Google Scholar
[6] Fiorek, A., Baranowski, J.M., Wysmolek, A., Pakula, K. and Wojdak, M., Acta Phys. Pol. A92, 742 (1997)Google Scholar
[7] Macado, P.C. and McGill, N.C., J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics 19, 873 (1986)Google Scholar
[8] Drechsler, M., Meyer, B.K., Detchprohm, D., Amano, H. and Akasaki, I., Jpn. Appl. Phys. 34, L1178 (1995)Google Scholar
[9] Alt, H.C., Meyer, B.K., Volm, D., Graber, A., Hoffman, D.M., Detchprohm, D., Amano, A. and Akasaki, I., Matter. Sci. Forum 196–201, 17 (1995)Google Scholar
[10] Perlin, P., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Suchanek, B., Knap, W., Camassel, J., T.Suski, Piotrzkowski, R., Grzegory, I., Porowski, S., Kaminska, E. and Chevrin, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1114, (1996)Google Scholar
[11] Moore, W.J., Freitas, J.A., Molnar, R.J., Phys.Rev. B156, 12073 (1997)Google Scholar
[12] Witowski, A.M., Sadowski, M.L., Pakula, K. and Wyder, P., phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 210, 385 (1998)Google Scholar
[13] Witowski, A.M., Pakula, K., Baranowski, J.M., Sadowski, M.L. and Wyder, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 4154 (1999)Google Scholar
[14] Suzuki, M., Uenoyama, T. and Yanase, A., Phys. Rev. B52, 8132 (1995)Google Scholar
[15] Majewski, J., Stadele, M. and P.Vogl, MateRes, r.. Soc. Symp. Proc. 449, 887 (1997)Google Scholar
[16] Kim, K., Lambrecht, W.R.L., Segall, B. and Schilgaarde, M. van, Phys. Rev. B56, 7363 (1997)Google Scholar
[17] Mireles, F. and Ulloa, S.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 248 (1999)Google Scholar
[18] Wang, H. and Chen, A.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 248 (2000)Google Scholar