Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T06:59:42.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of Portland Cement and Pure C3S Using 1-D Sans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

R. Berliner ,
B. J. Heuser  and
M. Popovici
R. Berliner
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Research Reactor Center, Columbia, MO 65211
B. J. Heuser
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, Urbana, IL 61801
M. Popovici
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Research Reactor Center, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access

Abstract

The effect of contrast matching in ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and pure C3S has been investigated as a function of time after hydration using the 1-D small-angle scattering technique. The observed scattering response of OPC hydrated with 100% D2O increased in time, while the response of OPC hydrated with a null water mixture did not. The increase in scattering is therefore attributed to the formation of bubbles in the water-filled pores of the hydrating cement paste. The addition of 1% CaCl2 to OPC increased the kinetics of bubble formation considerably. Based on similar contrast measurements, we have concluded that bubbles do not form in pure C3S. However, the addition of 1% CaCl2 was found to induce bubble formation in the hydrated C3S compound.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 376: Symposium BB – Neutron Scattering in Materials Science , 1994 , 481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 Taylor, H. F. W., Cement Chemistry, (Academic Press, London, 1990).Google Scholar
2 Winslow, D. N. and Diamond, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57, 193–197, (1974).Google Scholar
3 Allen, A. J., G.Windsor, C., Rainey, B., Pearson, D., Double, D. D. and McN Alford, N., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 15, 1817–1844, (1982).Google Scholar
4 Pearson, D. and Allen, A. J., J. Mat, Sci. 20, 303–315, (1985).Google Scholar
5 Allen, A. J., J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 624–634, (1991).Google Scholar
6 Haussler, F., Eichorn, F., Rohling, S. and Brumbach, H., Cement and Concrete Research 20, 644–654, (1990).Google Scholar
7 Eichorn, F., Haussler, F. and Brumbach, H., J. de Physique IV, 1, 369–372, (1993).Google Scholar
8 Heuser, B.J., Popovici, M., Berliner, R., Neutron Scattering in Materials Science, (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. BB, 1994).Google Scholar
9 “Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays”, Guinier, A. and Fournet, G.. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1955, p115.Google Scholar