Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:57:10.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interface Tribology Via Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

W. G. Hoover ,
C. G. Hoover ,
I. F. Stowers  and
W.J. Siekhaus
W. G. Hoover
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Post Office Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550 Department of Applied Science, University of California at Davis-Livermore, Post Office Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
C. G. Hoover
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Post Office Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
I. F. Stowers
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Post Office Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
W.J. Siekhaus
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Post Office Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

By borrowing ideas from control theory, Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics incorporates temperature, stress, and heat flux directly into atomistic, time-reversible, deterministic equations of motion. We are applying this technique to studies of surface indentation, surface cutting, friction, ablation, and condensation. Here we describe simulations of the indentation and cutting processes using two-dimensional crystals composed of a few thousand particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 140: Symposium S – New Materials Approaches to Tribology: Theory and Applications , 1988 , 119
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Binnig, G. and Rohrer, H., Scientific American 253, 50 (August, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Jandrisevits, R. A., Energy and Technology Review, UCRL-52000-87-9 (September, 1987), page 15.Google Scholar
3 Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Daw, M. S. and Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. Letters 59, 2756 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Hoover, W. G., Molecular Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 258 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).Google Scholar
6 Groot, A. J. De, Parker, S. R., and Johansson, E. M., in SVD and Signal Processing, Algorithms, Applications, and Architectures (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988), p. 439.Google Scholar
7 Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Nosé, S., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Nosé, S., Mol. Phys. 52, 255 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Hoover, W. G., Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Vineyard, G., J. Appl. Phys., cover (August, 1959).Google Scholar
12 Holian, B. L. and Grady, D. E., Phys. Rev. Letters 60, 1355 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar