Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-08T17:55:59.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Glass Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D. F. Hasson  and
S. G. Fishman
D. F. Hasson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402
S. G. Fishman
Affiliation:
Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA 22217
Get access

Abstract

Ceramic matrix composites with continuous fibers in glass matrices were tested with instrumented impact apparatuses. The composite architectures were unidirectional (0°) and crossply (0/90°). For the 0/90° laminates, interlaminar and edge on orientation specimens were tested. An orientation dependence was observed. The CMC material with a weaker fiber/matrix interfacial bond had longer fiber pullout, and hence due to the frictional sliding mechanism higher dynamic work to fracture. In the fracture analysis discussion it is suggested that the use of the LEFM, K, parameter should be qualified in the fracture testing of CMC materials. These qualified toughness K values were found to be in the range of those reported for metal matrix composites.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 120: Symposium G – High-Temperature/High-Performance Composites , 1988 , 285
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bowen, D.H., Fibre Sci. Tech., 1, No. 2, 85, (1968).Google Scholar
[2] Crivelli-Visconti, I. and Cooper, G.A., Nature, 221, 754 (1969)Google Scholar
[3] Prewo, K.M., Brennan, J.J. and Layden, G.K., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65(2), 305 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Marshall, D.B. and Evans, A.G., J. Amer. Cer. Soc., 68(5), 225 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Aveston, J., Cooper, G.A. and Kelly, A., in The Properties of Fiber Composities, (IPC Science & Technology Press Ltd., Surrey, UK), 15 (1971).Google Scholar
[6] Evans, A.G., Thouless, M.D., Johnson-Walls, D.P. and Luh, E.Y., in Fifth International Conference on Composite Materials ICCM-V, edited by W.C. Harrigan, Jr., J. Strife and A.K. Dhingra (The Metallurgical Society/AIME, Warrendale), 543 (1985).Google Scholar
[7] Lankford, J., in Fifth International Conference on Composite Materials ICCM-V, edited by W.C. Harrigan, Jr., J. Strife and A.K. Dhingra (The Metallurgical Society/AIME, Warrendale), 587 (1985).Google Scholar
[8] Shaizero, O. and Evans, A.G., J. Amer. Cer. Soc., 69, 481 (1986).Google Scholar
[9] Prewo, K.M., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 294, 551 (1980).Google Scholar
[10] Hasson, D.F. and Fishman, S.G., in Sixth International Conference on Composite Materials, Volume 2, edited by F.L. Matthews, N.C.R. Buskell, J.M. Hodgkinson and J. Morton (Elsevier Applied Science, London), 2.40 (1987).Google Scholar
[11] Tredway, W.K. and Prewo, K.M., UTRC Ann. Rept. R87–917470-1, ONR Contr. N00014–85-C-0332 (1987).Google Scholar
[12] Prewo, K.M. and Nardone, V.C., UTRC Ann. Rept. R86–917161-1, ONR Contr. N00014–85-C-0332 (1986).Google Scholar
[13] Prewo, K.M., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 3590 (1986).Google Scholar
[14] Phillips, D.C. and Davidge, R.W., Br. Ceram. Trans. J., 85, 123 (1986).Google Scholar
[15] Hasson, D.F., Hoover, S.M. and Crowe, C.R., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 4147 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Prewo, K.M., Layden, G.K., Minford, E.J. and Brennan, J.J., UTRC Interim Rept. R85–916629-1, ONR Contr. N00014–81-C-0571 (1985).Google Scholar