Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:52:20.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hg1-xCdxTe: Defect Structure Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M.A. Berding ,
A. Sher  and
A.-B. Chen
M.A. Berding
Affiliation:
SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025
A. Sher
Affiliation:
SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025
A.-B. Chen
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849–3501
Get access

Abstract

Native point defects play an important role in HgCdTe. Here we discuss some of the relevant mass action equations, and use recently calculated defect formation energies to discuss relative defect concentrations. In agreement with experiment, the Hg vacancy is found to be the dominant native defect to accommodate excess tellurium. Preliminary estimates find the Hg antisite and the Hg interstitial to be of comparable densities. Our calculated defect formation energies are also consistent with measured diffusion activation energies, assuming the interstitial and vacancy migration energies are small.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 216: Symposium T – Long-Wavelength Semiconductor Devices, Materials and Processes , 1990 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Vydyanath, H. R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 2609 (1981).Google Scholar
[2] Vydyanath, H. R., Donovan, J.C., and Nelson, D.A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 2625 (1981).Google Scholar
[3] Berding, M.A., Schilfgaarde, M. van, Paxton, A.T., and Sher, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 1103 (1990).Google Scholar
[4] A different reference is used here than was used in Table III in Reference 3. An error appears in that table owing to the incorrect use of an energy of 2Eb per unit cell rather than 4Eb. The defect energies in Table I in Ref. 3 from which the energies in Table III were derived, are correct.Google Scholar
[5] Sher, A., Schilfgaarde, M. van, and Berding, M.A., presented at the 1990 HgCdTe Workshop in San Francisco, CA, and accepted for publication in J. Vac. Sci. Technol.Google Scholar
[6] Berding, M.A., Sher, A., and Chen, A.-B., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5064 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Amirtharaj, P.M. and Pollak, F.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 4L, 789 (1984).Google Scholar
[8] Compaan, A., Bowman, R.C., and Cooper, D.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1055 (1990).Google Scholar
[9] Vodopyanov, L.K., Kozyrev, S.P., Aleshchenko, Y. A., Triboulet, R., and Marfaing, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1057 (1990).Google Scholar
[10] Zamir, D., Beshah, K., Becla, P., Wolff, P.A., Griffin, R.G., Zax, D., Vega, S., and Yellin, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 6, 2612 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Tang, M.-F.S. and Stevenson, D.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1, 544 (1990), and references therein.Google Scholar
[12] Richter, V. and Kalish, R., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6578 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar