Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T03:29:36.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glass as a Waste Form for the Immobilization of Plutonium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. K. Bates ,
A. J. G. Ellison ,
J. W. Emery  and
J. C. Hoh
J. K. Bates
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
A. J. G. Ellison
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
J. W. Emery
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
J. C. Hoh
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

Several alternatives for disposal of surplus plutonium are being considered. One method is incorporating Pu into glass and in this paper we discuss the development and corrosion behavior of an alkali-tin-silicate glass and update results in testing Pu doped Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) reference glasses. The alkali-tin-silicate glass was engineered to accommodate a high Pu loading and to be durable under conditions likely to accelerate glass reaction. The glass dissolves about 7 wt% Pu together with the neutron absorber Gd, and under test conditions expected to accelerate the glass reaction with water, is resistant to corrosion. The Pu and the Gd are released from the glass at nearly the same rate in static corrosion tests in water, and are not segregated into surface alteration phases when the glass is reacted in water vapor. Similar results for the behavior of Pu and Gd are found for the DWPF reference glasses, although the long-term rate of reaction for the reference glasses is more rapid than for the alkalitin-silicate glass.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 57
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, Committee on International Security and Arms Control, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1994).Google Scholar
2. Ramsey, W. G., Bibler, N. E., and Meaker, T. F., “Compositions and Durabilities of Glasses for Immobilization of Plutonium and Uranium,” presented at Waste Management '95, Tucson, AZ, February 27-March 3, 1995.Google Scholar
3. Plodinec, M. J., Development of Glass Compositions for Immobilization of SRP Waste, Savannah River Laboratory Report DP-1517 (1979).Google Scholar
4. McKibben, J. M. et al., Vitrification of Excess Plutonium, Westinghouse Savannah River Company Report WSRC-RP-755 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Veal, B. W., Munday, J. N., and Lam, D. J., “Actinides in Silicate Glasses,” in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of the Actinides, Freeman, A. J. and Lander, G. H., eds., pp. 271–309 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Walker, C. T. and Riege, U., “Compatibility of Actinides with HLW Borosilicate Glass: Solubility and Phase Formation,” in Ceramics in Nuclear Waste, Chikalla, T. D. and Mendel, J. E., eds., CONF-790420, pp. 198–202 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Ebert, W. L., The Effects of the Glass Surface Area/Solution Volume Ratio on Glass Corrosion: A Critical Review, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-94/34 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Bates, J. K. et al., “Performance of High Plutonium-Containing Glasses for the Immobilization of Surplus Fissile Materials,” presented at the American Ceramic Society Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, May 1-4, 1995.Google Scholar
9. Ellison, A. J. G., Mazer, J. J. and Ebert, W. L., Effect of Glass Composition on Waste Form Durability: A Critical Review, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-94/28 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Dickinson, J. E. Jr., and Hess, P. C., “Rutile Solubility and Titanium Coordination Number in Silicate Melts,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 2289–2296 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Ellison, A. J. G., Hess, P. C., and Naski, G. C., “Cassiterite Solubility in High-Silica K20-Al2O3-SiO2 Liquids,” Submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 8/95.Google Scholar
12. Ellison, A. J. G. and Hess, P. C., “Raman Study of Potassium Silicate Glasses Containing Rb+, Sr2+, Y3+, and Zr4+: Implications for Cation Solution Mechanisms in Multicomponent Silicate Liquids,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 1877–1887 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Ellison, A. J. G. and Navrotsky, A., “Thermochemistry and Structure of Model Waste Glass Compositions,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 193–207 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Ryerson, F. J., “Oxide Solution Mechanisms in Silicate Melts: Systematic Variations in the Activity Coefficient of SiO2,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 637–649 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Bates, J. K. et al., ANL Technical Support Program for DOE Environmental Restoration and Waste Management: Annual Report October 1993-September 1994. Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-95/20 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Abrajano, T. A., Bates, J. K., and Mazer, J. J., “Aqueous Corrosion of Natural and Nuclear Waste Glasses. II. Mechanisms of Vapor Hydration of Nuclear Waste Glasses,” J. Non-Crys. Solids, 108, 269–276 (1989).Google Scholar