Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T03:07:06.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of SN Additions on Superplasticity in Al-Mg-Mn-Sc Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. H. Henager Jr. ,
J. S. Vetrano ,
V. Y. Gertsman  and
S. M. Bruemmer
C. H. Henager Jr.
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, chuck.henager@pnl.gov
J. S. Vetrano
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, chuck.henager@pnl.gov
V. Y. Gertsman
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, chuck.henager@pnl.gov
S. M. Bruemmer
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, chuck.henager@pnl.gov
Get access

Abstract

Identical Al-Mg-Mn-Sc alloys without and with 0.034-wt% Sn additions were fabricated, heat-treated, and tensile tested in a fine-grain (d < 6 pm) condition at four strain rates from 10−2 to 10−4 s−1 and at temperatures from 723K to 823K. Alloys with Sn additions exhibited reduced failure strains at 723K but higher failure strains at 823K for the slowest strain rates. The effect of Sn on flow stress, activation energy for flow stress, and strain rate exponent was explored and was found to be small. The main effect of Sn was suggested to be in reducing cavitation by allowing a redistribution of stress at critical hetero-junctions in the alloys.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 601: Symposium HH – Superplasticity-Current Status & Future Potential , 1999 , 31
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Ashby, M. F. and Verrall, R. A., Acta Metall., 1973, 21 (2), pp. 149–163.10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6Google Scholar
2. Sherby, O. D. and Wadsworth, J., Prog. Mater. Sci., 1989,33 (3), pp. 169–221.10.1016/0079-6425(89)90004-2Google Scholar
3. Sutton, A. P. and Balluffi, R. W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, 1995, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
4. Lojkowski, W., Wyrzykowski, J. W., Kwiecinski, J., Beke, D. L., and Godeny, I., Diffus. Defect Data, Pt. A, 1990, 66–69 (Diffus. Met. Alloys-DIMETA 88, Pt. 2), pp. 701–712.Google Scholar
5. Song, S. G., Vetrano, J. S., and Bruemmer, S. M., Mater. Sci. & Engr. A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing, 1997, A232 (1-2), pp. 23–30.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00090-7Google Scholar
6. Vetrano, J. S., Henager, J. C. H., Simonen, E. P., Song, S. G., and Bruemmer, S. M., in Boundaries and Interfaces in Materials: The David A. Smith Memorial Symposium, 1998, Indianapolis, IN, TMS, Warrendale, OH, pp. 205–212.Google Scholar
7. Sercombe, T. B. and Schaffer, G. B., Acta Mater., 1999, 47 (2), pp. 689–697.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00353-XGoogle Scholar
8. McNelley, T. R., Michel, D. J., and Salama, A., Scripta Metall., 1989, 23, pp. 1657–1662.10.1016/0036-9748(89)90338-4Google Scholar