Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T16:20:05.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of the Post-Closure Safety Case for the Low Level Waste Disposal Site at Drigg, United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Len Watts
Len Watts*
Affiliation:
Environmental Risk Assessments, Research & Technology, British Nuclear Fuels plc, Risley, Warrington, WA3 6AS, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the development of the post-closure safety case (PCSC) for the solid low level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal site at Drigg. The paper outlines the background to the site, the implementation of a systematic approach to understanding the site and undertaking a post-closure radiological safety assessment (PCRSA), communication activities, key factors in the PCSC and issues to be investigated further in the forward programme.

The Drigg site is the UK's principal near-surface facility for disposal of LLW. Disposals commenced in 1959 to trenches whereas current practice involves disposal to concrete vaults. Disposals are carried out under an authorisation from the UK Environment Agency. Periodically the Environment Agency reviews the authorisation to ensure consistency with current regulatory requirements. British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) will produce an updated PCSC in 2002; in preparation for this, BNFL published in March 2000 a status report on the development of the PCSC.

BNFL and the Environment Agency conduct an information exchange process on the development of the PCSC. This process has led to notable improvements, as well as affording a mechanism for providing clarifications and building confidence in the PCSC. BNFL undertakes other communication activities including scientific publication, conference presentation, participation in international programmes (such as those of the IAEA and NEA) and liaison with local communities. Peer review of the PCSC is also being carried out.

Central to the safety case is a systematic PCRSA, which promotes transparency and traceability and demonstrates a rigorous treatment of relevant uncertainties. The approach aligns with international best practice for near-surface disposal facilities and includes the assessment of features, events and processes and the use of tools such as conceptual model uncertainty forms. This formalisation helps to identify and understand the key factors for the PCSC. Additional qualitative or simple quantitative information is used to augment the PCRSA so as to provide a wider context to inform decision-making.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ7.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Environment Agency, Scottish Environment Protection Agency, and Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland. Disposal Facilities on Land for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Wastes: Guidance on Requirements for Authorisation. Environment Agency, Bristol (1997).Google Scholar
2.BNFL. Status Report on the Development of the 2002 Drigg Post-Closure Safety Case (2000).Google Scholar
3. Thomson, G., Egan, M., Kane, P., Thorne, M., Clements, L. and Humphreys, P.. Use of a Systematic Approach for the Drigg Post-Closure Radiological Safety Assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Radioactive Waste Disposal (DisTec), pp 413–417, Berlin (2000).Google Scholar
4. IAEA. ISAM, the International Programme for Improving Long-term Safety Assessment Methodologies for Near Surface Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: Objectives, Content and Work Programme, IAEA report ISAM/G/0197, Vienna (1997).Google Scholar
5. Small, J., Humphreys, P., Johnstone, T., Plant, R., Randall, M. and Trivedi, D.. Results of an Aqueous Source Term Model for a Radiological Risk Assessment of the Drigg LLW Site, UK. In Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 608, pp 129–134, Boston (1999).Google Scholar
6. Kelly, E., Watts, L. and Grimwood, P.. Development and Presentation of the Drigg Post-Closure Safety Case. In Values in Decisions on Risk (VALDOR), pp 487–494, Stockholm (2001).Google Scholar