Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T23:19:32.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Single and Double Stranded Dna Binding to Polypyrrole.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Rajiv Pande ,
Jeong - Ok Lim ,
Kenneth A. Marx ,
Sukant K. Tripathy  and
David L. Kaplan
Rajiv Pande
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854,
Jeong - Ok Lim
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854,
Kenneth A. Marx
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854,
Sukant K. Tripathy
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854,
David L. Kaplan
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Division, U.S. Army Natick Research, Development & Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760.
Get access

Abstract

The polycation conducting polymer, oxidized polypyrrole (PPy), possesses the ability to form complexes with DNA. Our previously proposed diffusion limited binding model for double helical DNA was also found to be applicable to single stranded DNA in this study. Single stranded DNA was found to bind PPy at a nearly identical level to that of double helical DNA. An investigation of electropolymerized PPy film morphology using SEM revealed two distinctly differing surface morphologies for the Platinum (Pt) electrode face (smooth) and polymeric growth face (rough). The DNA uptake levels were found to be consistently different on either surface, being higher on the rough surface. DNA penetrated into the disk interior with increasing time periods of exposure while a similar phenomenon but to a lesser extent was observed for single stranded DNA.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 292: Symposium S – Biomolecular Materials , 1992 , 135
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Roncali, J., Yassar, A. and Garnier, F., Synthetic Metals, 28 C 275 (1989).Google Scholar
(2) Hotta, S., Synthetic Metals, 22, 103 (1987); 26, (1988).Google Scholar
(3) Diaz, A. F. and Lacroix, J. C., New J. Chem, 12,171 (1988).Google Scholar
(4) Malhotra, B. D., Kumar, N. and Chandra, S., Prog. Poly. Sci., 12 179 (1988).Google Scholar
(5) Minehan, D. S., Marx, K. A. and Tripathy, S. K., Macromolecules in Press.Google Scholar
(6) Lim, J. O., Minehan, D.S., Kamath, M., Marx, K. A. and Tripathy, S. K. MRS Proceedings 255 (1992).Google Scholar
(7) Minehan, D. S., Marx, K. A. and Tripathy, S. K., Proc. Amer. Chem. Soc. Div. Polymeric Materials: Science & Eng. 64, 341–342 Google Scholar
(8) Vrentas, J. S. and Duda, J. L., ”Diffusion”, in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Vol.5, eds. Mark, H.F. et al. (John Wiley Inc, New York 1986), pp 462–507.Google Scholar
(9) Marx, K. A., Ruben, G. C., Pande, Rajiv, Lim, J. O., Tripathy, S. K. and Kaplan, D. L., manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar