Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-19T20:04:45.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cobalt Silicide Formation on Polysilicon: Dopant Effects on Reaction Kinetics and Silicide Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A.R. Sitaram  and
S.P. Murarka
A.R. Sitaram
Affiliation:
now with APRDL, Motorola Inc., 3501, Ed Bluestein Boulevard, Austin, TX 78721.
S.P. Murarka
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department/CIE, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180.
Get access

Abstract

The concept of using cobalt disilicide as a self-aligned metallization scheme for gate/interconnection and contact formation is gaining wide acceptance. The silicide formation on the gate will require a Co-metal film interaction with the underlying polysilicon that may be doped heavily. We have investigated the silicide formation kinetics during this reaction. The effect of different dopants (B,P, and As) and their concentration on the Co-Si interaction and the dopant redistribution during such reactions were investigated. The results from these studies will be presented and discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 182: Symposium C – Polysilicon Thin Films and Interfaces , 1990 , 83
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Murarka, S.P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 4(6), 1325 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Murarka, S.P., Fraser, D.B., Sinha, A.K., Levinstein, H.J., Lloyd, E.J., Liu, R., Williams, D.S., and Hillenius, S.J., IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev., ED-34(10), 2108 (1987).10.1109/T-ED.1987.23204Google Scholar
3. Murarka, S.P. and Lloyd, E.J., Unpublished.Google Scholar
4. Maex, K., Ghosh, G., Delaey, L., Probst, V., Lippens, P., Hove, L. Van den, and Keersmaecker, R.F. De, J. Mater. Res., 4(5), 1209 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Murarka, S.P. and Williams, D.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5(6), 1674 (1987).10.1116/1.583648Google Scholar
6. Gurp, G.J. van, Weg, W.F. van der, and Sigurd, D., J. Appl. Phys., 49, 4011 (1978).10.1063/1.325360Google Scholar
7. Pretorius, R., Wandt, M.A.E., MacLeod, J.E., Botha, A.P., and Comrie, C.M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 136(3), 839 (198).10.1149/1.2096753Google Scholar
8. Kern, W., Solid State Technology, 15, 34 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Biersack, J.P. and Hoggmark, L.P., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Sitaram, A.R., Murarka, S.P., and Sheng, T.T., J. Mater. Res., 5(2), 360 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Pal, C.S., Baiocchi, F.A., and Williams, D.S., J. Appl. Phys., 67(3), 1940 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Sitaram, A.R., Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, (1990).Google Scholar
13. d'Huerle, F.M. and Petersson, C.S., Thin Solid Films, 128, 283 (1985).Google Scholar