Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T17:22:44.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Mo/Si Multilayer Structures by High-Resolution Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Chung-Hee Chang ,
Mary Beth Stearns  and
David J. Smith
Chung-Hee Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
Mary Beth Stearns
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
David J. Smith
Affiliation:
Also at Center for Solid State Science
Get access

Abstract

A series of Mo/Si multilayer films (MLF) has been fabricated by e-beam evaporation onto (100) silicon substrates at substrate temperatures (Ts) in the range of 300 to 600K, with deposition rates varying from 0.5 to 3Å/s. The quality of the samples fabricated at 525K≤Ts≤575K with a deposition rate of 1Å/s was found by high-resolutlon electron microscopy to be comparable to that of sputtered films. The major differences between the structures of the e-beam evaporated samples and the sputtered ones were that the thicknesses of the Mo on Si interfaces were larger, and the Si on Mo interfaces were smaller, for the e-beam MLF.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 139: Symposium R – High Resolution Microscopy of Materials , 1989 , 339
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. See Multilayer Structures and Laboratory X-ray Laser Research, edited by Ceglio, N.M. and Dhez, P. (Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instr. Eng. 688, Bellinghan, WA 1986).Google Scholar
2. Barbee, T.W. Jr., Mrowka, S. and Hettrick, M.C., Appl. Opt. 24, 883 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Stearns, D.G., Ceglio, N.M., Hawryluk, A.M., Stearns, M.B., Petford-Long, A.K., Chang, C.-H., Danzmann, K., Kuhne, M., Muller, P. and Wende, B., Proc. SPIE 688, 91 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Petford-Long, A.K., Stearns, M.B., Chang, C.-H., Nutt, S.R., Stearn, D.G., Ceglio, N.M. and Hawryluk, A.M., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 1422 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Nakajima, H., Fujimori, H. and Koiwa, M., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 1046 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sloof, W.G., Loopstra, O.B., Keijser, T.H. and Mittemeijer, E.J., Scrip. Met. 20, 1683 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Stearns, D.G., Stearns, M.B. and Chang, C.-H. (to be published)Google Scholar
8. Stearns, M.B., Lee, C.H. and Vernon, S.P., Jour. Magn. Matls. 54–57, 791 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bravman, J. and Sinclair, R., J. Elect. Microsc. Tech. 1, 53 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Self, P.G., Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H., and Stobbs, M.W., Ultramicroscopy 6, 29 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Ruggiero, S.T., Barbee, T.W. Jr, and Beasley, M.R.., Phys. Rev. B 26, 4894 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Nakayama, N., Takahashi, K., Shinjo, T., Takana, T. and Ichinose, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 25, 552 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Chang, C.-H., Stearns, M.B. and Stearns, D.G. (in preparation).Google Scholar