Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T06:37:37.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Application of the Neutron Probe to the Nondestructive Examination of Architectural and Archaeological Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Richard A. Livingston ,
L. Chang ,
L.S. Evans  and
J.I. Trombka
Richard A. Livingston
Affiliation:
Geology Department, U. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
L. Chang
Affiliation:
Geology Department, U. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
L.S. Evans
Affiliation:
Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771
J.I. Trombka
Affiliation:
Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771
Get access

Abstract

The neutron probe is a non-destructive technique for examining materials that is based on prompt neutron/gamma spectroscopy. It can be used either at a nuclear reactor or, with portable neutron sources, in the field or even underwater. Since it is sensitive to a wide range of elements, it can be applied to many problems in materials analysis and conservation. A description of the major features of the neutron probe's operation is presented, along with a case study of chloride deterioration of an historic brick structure at Colonial Williamsburg.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 123: Symposium L – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology I , 1988 , 59
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Chrien, R., Radiative Neutron Capture (Pergamon Press, NY 1984).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, D.L., Failey, M.P., Zoller, W.H., Walters, W.B., Gordon, G.E. and Lindstrom, R.M., J. Radio. Chem. 63 (1) 97–119 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Glascock, M.D., Spalding, T.G., Biers, J.C. and Cornman, M.F., Archaeometry 26 (1) 96–103 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Thomas, B.W., Clayton, C.G., Ranasinghe, V. and Blair, I.M. in Nuclear Geophysics, edited by Clayton, C.G. (Pergamon Press, NY, 1983), pp. 437–450.Google Scholar
5. Pearson, C. in Protection of the Underwater Heritage (UNESCO Paris 1981) pp. 90–107.Google Scholar
6. Livingston, R.A., Evans, L.G., Taylor, T.H. and Trombka, J.I., in Building Performance: Function, Preservation and Rehabilitation, STP 901, edited by Davis, G. (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1986), pp. 165–180.Google Scholar
7. Evans, L.G., Trombka, J.I., Livingston, R.A. and Taylor, T.H., Nucl. Inst. and Methods A242 346–356 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Moioli, P., Evans, L.G., Trombka, J.I. and Livingston, R.A. Proceedings of the AISA-ISSA Meeting on New Paths in the Use of Nuclear Techniques for Art and Archaeology (Trieste, Italy, 1985) pp. 90–102.Google Scholar
9. Livingston, R.A., Can. Mineral. 24 307–322 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Taylor, T.H., Proceedings Int. Colloquium on Materials Science and Restoration (Technical Academy of Esslingen, Esslingen, W.Germany 1983) pp. 385–390.Google Scholar
11. Sayre, E.V. and Meyers, P., Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts 8 (4) 115–148 (1971).Google Scholar
12. Bavel, C.H. van, Proceedings Int. Symposium on Humidity and Moisture edited by Wexler, A. (Van Reinhold and Co., NY, 1965) 4, pp 205–211.Google Scholar
13. Rhodes, J.R., Stout, J.A., Sieberg, R.D. and Schindler, J.S., In Situ Determination of the Chloride Content of Portland Cement Concrete Bridge Decks, PBS 275376/AS (NTIS Springfield, VA 1980).Google Scholar