Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:10:32.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Annealing Study of Alpha-Decay Damage in Natural UO2 and ThO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P. J. Stout ,
G. R. Lumpkin ,
R. C. Ewing  and
Y. Eyal
P. J. Stout
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131
G. R. Lumpkin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131
R. C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131
Y. Eyal
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000 ISRAEL
Get access

Abstract

Isochronal annealing (100°–1200°C) of alpha-decay damage was performed on UO2 and ThO2 and isothermal annealing (400°C and 750°C) of UO2 was done to determine the change in unit cell parameter (UO2: ao = 5.501Å to 5.458Å ± 0.001; ThO2: ao = 5.548Å to 5.523Å ± 0.001), strain, and crystallite size (data inconclusive). Two recovery stages (UO2: Stage I at ≈225°C, Stage II at ≈675°C; ThO2: Stage I at ≈250°C, Stage II at ≈550°C) were observed for each. Strain decreased with temperature for both, but never completely recovered in either (UO2 final value: ≈2.37 × 10−3; ThO2 final value: ≈2.06 × 10−3).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 495
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Weber, W., J. Nuc. Mater. 98, 206–215 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Berman, R., Am. Min. 42(11,12), 705–731 (1957).Google Scholar
3. Weber, W., J. Nuc. Mater. 114, 213–221 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eyal, Y. and Fleischer, R., Geochim. et Cosmachim. Acta 49, 1155–1164 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Williamson, G. K. and Hall, W. H., Acta Metall. 1, 22–31 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Matzke, Hj., J. Chem. Soc. 83, 1121–1142 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Weber, W., Radiation Effects 83, 145–156 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar