Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T13:58:30.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncertainties in Container Failure Time Predictions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. E. Williford
R. E. Williford*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Stochastic variations in the local chemical environment of a geologic waste repository can cause corresponding variations in container corrosion rates and failure times, and thus in radionuclide release rates. This paper addresses how well the future variations in repository chemistries must be known in order to predict container failure times that are bounded by a finite time period within the repository lifetime. Preliminary results indicate that a 5000 year scatter in predicted container failure times requires that repository chemistries be known to within ±10% over the repository lifetime. These are small uncertainties compared to current estimates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 335
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Stahl, D. and Miller, N. E., compilers, Long-Term Performance of Materials used for High-Level Waste Packaging. NUREG/CR-3900, Vol. 4, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (1985).Google Scholar
2. Liebetrau, A. M., et al, The Analytical Repository Source-Term (AREST) Model: Description and Documentation. PNL-6346, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beck, T. R. and Alkire, R. C., “Occurrence of Salt Films During Initiation and Growth and Corrosion Pits”, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 1662–1666, (1979).Google Scholar
4. Farmer, J. C. and McCright, R. D., Review of Models Relevant to the Prediction of Performance of High-Level Radioactive-Waste Disposal Containers. UCRL - 100172, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1989).Google Scholar
5. Kubaschewski, O. and Hopkins, B. E., Oxidation of Metals and Alloys, Butterworth Publishers, London, p. 36, (1962).Google Scholar
6. Altenhofen, M. K. and Eslinger, P. W., Evaluation of Near-Field Thermal Environmental Conditions for a Spent-Fuel Repository in Tuff. PNL-SA-17391, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1989).Google Scholar
7. Glassley, W. E., “Geochemical Interactions”, presentation to the Technical Review Board at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, January 18, 1990.Google Scholar
8. Feder, J., Fractals. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 149–183, (1988).Google Scholar
9. Metals Handbook, Vol. 13, American Society for Metals, p. 561, (1985).Google Scholar