Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T16:55:04.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tensile and Stress-Rupture Behavior of Hafnium Carbide Dispersed Molybdenum and Tungsten Base Alloy Wires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

H.M. Yun  and
R.H. Titran
H.M. Yun
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
R.H. Titran
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Get access

Abstract

The tensile strain rate sensitivity and the stress-rupture strength of Mo-base and W-base alloy wires, 380 µm in diameter, were determined over the temperature range from 1200 to 1600 K. Three molybdenum alloy wires; Mo + 1.1 wt% hafnium carbide (MoHfC), Mo + 25 wt% W + 1.1 wt% hafnium carbide (MoHfC+25W) and Mo + 45 wt% W + 1.1 wt% hafnium carbide (MoHfC+45W), and a W + 0.4 wt% hafnium carbide (WHfC) tungsten alloy wire were evaluated.

The tensile strength of all wires studied was found to have a positive strain rate sensitivity. The strain rate dependency increased with increasing temperature and is associated with grain broadening of the initial fibrous structures. The hafnium carbide dispersed W-base and Mo-base alloys have superior tensile and stress-rupture properties than those without HfC. On a density compensated basis the MoHfC wires exhibit superior tensile and stress-rupture strengths to the WHfC wires up to approximately 1400 K. Addition of tungsten in the Mo-alloy wires was found to increase the long-term stress-rupture strength at temperatures above 1400 K.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 322: Symposium F – High-Temperature Silicides and Refractory Alloys , 1993 , 473
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Petrasek, D.W. and Titran, R.H.: NASA TM-100804, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Petrasek, D.W.: NASA TN D-6881, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1972.Google Scholar
3. Yun, H.M.: “Proc. of the Symposium on Refractory Metals-State of the Art,” sponsored by TMS of AIME, Chicago, IL, Sept. 27-29, 1988, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
4. Petrasek, D.W. and Signorelli, R.A.: NASA TN D-5 139, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1969.Google Scholar
5. Tietz, T.E. and Wilson, J.W.: Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1965, pp. 156–205.Google Scholar
6. Houck, J.A.: Defense Metal Information Center Rept. 140, OTS PB 151099, 1960.Google Scholar
7. McDanels, D.L. and Signorelli, R.A.: NASA TN D-3467, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Warren, R. and Anderson, C.H.: “Proc. 10th Plansee Seminar, vol. 2, Ortner, H.M., ed., Metallwerk Plansee, Austria, 1981, pp. 243–246.Google Scholar
9. Robinson, S.L. and Sherby, O.D.: Acta Metall., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Agronov, D., Freund, E., and Rosen, A.: High Temperature-High Pressure, 1986, vol. 18, pp. 151–159.Google Scholar
11. Ebeling, R. and Ashby, M.F.: Phil. Mag., 1966, vol. 13, pp. 805–834.Google Scholar
12. Wright, R.N., Brusso, J.A., and Mikkola, D.E.: Mats. Sci. and Engr., 1988, A104, pp. 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Petrasek, D.W.: NASA TN D-6881, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1972.Google Scholar