Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T14:18:45.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Reconstruction of Platinum and Gold and the Embedded Atom Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Michael I. Haftel
Michael I. Haftel*
Affiliation:
Code 4651, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
Get access

Abstract

We investigate the surface reconstructions of various faces of gold and platinum theoretically with a number of embedded atom potentials. We find that whereas all potentials examined predict equivalent bulk properties, only those with a relatively steep embedding function at surface electron densities predict the experimentally observed buckled quasihexagonal reconstruction for the (100) faces and surface energies in close agreement with experiment. Almost all embedded atom potentials considered predict the observed 2×1 missing row structure for the (110) faces, and some the observed missing row structure for the (311) face of platinum.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 238: Symposium Cb – Structure and Properties of Interfaces in Materials , 1991 , 229
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983); Phys. Rev. B29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Stephen Foiles, M. and Daw, Murray S., Phys. Rev. B38, 12643 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Baskes, M.I., Foiles, S.M. and Daw, M.S., Mat. Sci. For. 46, 187 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M.I. and Daw, M.S., Phys. Rev. B33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Ercolessi, F., Tosatti, E. and Parrinello, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57. 719 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Dodson, Brian W., Phys. Rev. B35, 880 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Daw, Murray S., Surf. Sci. 166, L161 (1986);Google Scholar
Foiles, S. M., Surf. Sci. 191, L779 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Haftel, M. I., Andreadis, T.D., Lili, J.V., and Eridon, J.M., Phys. Rev. B42, 11540 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Clarke, T.A., Mason, R. and Tescari, M., Surf. Sci. 40, 1 (1973);Google Scholar
Van Hove, M.A. et. al., Surf. Sci. 103, 189 (1981); 102, 218 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Chan, C.M. and Van Hove, M.A., Surf. Sci. 171, 226 (1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlieg, E., Robinson, I.K. and Kern, K., Surf. Sci. 233, 248 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Gao, Q. J. and Tsong, T.T., Phys. Rev. B36, 2547 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Oh, D.J. and Johnson, R.A., J. Mater. Res. 3, 471 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Roelofs, L.D., Foiles, S.M., Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Surf. Sci. 234, 63 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Sabochick, M.J. and Richlin, D.L., Phys. Rev. B37, 10846 (1987).Google Scholar