Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T07:59:24.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Study of the Dynamic Scaling Properties of Rough Vapor-Deposited Silver Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

G. Palasantzas  and
J. Krim
G. Palasantzas
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Department of Physics, Boston MA 02115
J. Krim
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Department of Physics, Boston MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the scaling behaviour of vapor-deposited silver films at room temperature by means of scanning tunneling Microscopy. The film-thickness range was ≈ 10 – 1000 nm. The roughness exponent H is observed to be H = 0.82 ± 0.05. The growth and dynamic scaling exponents are respectively observed to be β = 0.29 ± 0.06, and z = 2.53 ±0.50.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 317: Symposium B – Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution , 1993 , 111
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[l] Surface Disordering: Growth, Roughening and Phase Transitions, Juliién, R., Kertész, J., Meakin, P. and Wolf, D.E., eds. (Nova Science, Commack, 1992).Google Scholar
[2] Viscek, T., Fractal Growth Phenomena (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).Google Scholar
[3] Mandelbrot, B. B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
[4] Family, F., and Vicsek, T., Dynamice of Fractal Surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Krim, J. and Indekeu, J.O., Phys. Rev. E 48, 1576 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Family, F. and Vicsek, T., J. Phys. A 18, L75 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Digital Instruments, Nanoscope II.Google Scholar
[8] Palasantzas, G. et al, Phys. Rev. B 48 2873 (1993);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K. et al, Phys. Rev. B 38, 2297 (1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pynn, R., Phys. Rev. B 45, 602 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, W. et al, Phys. Rev. B 46, 7953 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. et al, Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 80 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Krim, J., Heyvaert, I., Van Haesendonck, C., and Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 57, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Palasantzas, G., Phys. Rev. B 48, 14472 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Thompson, C., Palasantzas, G., Feng, Y. P., Sinha, S. K., and Krim, J., in press to Phys. Rev. B (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Wolf, D.E. and Villain, J. Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Z. W. and Sarma, S. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2348 (1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, J. and Family, F., submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (Private communication).Google Scholar