Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-jlx94 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-15T01:21:53.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of the Engineered Barrier System in Safety Cases for Geological Radioactive Waste Repositories: An NEA Initiative in Co-operation with the EC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

David G. Bennett ,
Alan J. Hooper ,
Sylvie Voinis  and
Hiroyuki Umeki
David G. Bennett
Affiliation:
Galson Sciences Ltd
Alan J. Hooper
Affiliation:
UK Nirex Ltd
Sylvie Voinis
Affiliation:
OECD NEA
Hiroyuki Umeki
Affiliation:
EA
Get access

Extract

Radioactive waste derives from all phases of the nuclear fuel cycle and from the use of radioactive materials in industrial, medical, military and research applications; all such wastes must be managed safely. The most hazardous and long-lived wastes, such as spent nuclear fuel and waste from nuclear fuel reprocessing, must be contained and isolated from humans and the environment for many thousands of years. Many Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) member countries are, therefore, researching plans for the management of long-lived radioactive waste in engineered facilities, or repositories, located deep underground in suitable geological formations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 120.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Nuclear Energy Agency (2001), Establishing and Communicating Confidence in the Safety of Deep Geologic Disposal, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
2. Nuclear Energy Agency (2004): Post-closure Safety Case for Geological Repositories, Nature and Purpose, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
3. Nuclear Energy Agency and European Commission (2003): Engineered Barrier Systems and the Safety of Deep Geological Repositories – State-of-the-art Report, European Commission EUR 19964 EN, OECD, Paris, ISBN 92-64-18498-8.Google Scholar
4. Nuclear Energy Agency (2003): Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS) in the Context of the Entire Safety Case, NEA-EC Joint Workshop Proceedings, Oxford, United Kingdom, 25-27 September 2002, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
5. Nuclear Energy Agency (2003): Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS): Design Requirements and Constraints, NEA-EC Joint Workshop Proceedings, Turku, Finland, 26-29 August 2003, OECD, Paris, ISBN 92-64-02068-3.Google Scholar
6. Nuclear Energy Agency; Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS): Process Issues, NEA-EC Joint Workshop Proceedings, Las Vegas, United States, 14-17 September 2004, OECD, Paris (in press).Google Scholar
7. Nuclear Energy Agency: Integration of Engineered Barrier System (EBS) in the Safety Case: Role of Modelling, NEA-EC Joint Workshop Proceedings, La Coruña, Spain, 24 26 August 2005, OECD, Paris (in preparation).Google Scholar