Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T00:05:16.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship Between Materials Properties and Shape Memory Behavior in Epoxy-Amine Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ingrid A Rousseau  and
Tao Xie
Ingrid A Rousseau
Affiliation:
ingrid.rousseau@gm.com, General Motors Corp., 30500 Mound Road, MC: 480-106-710, Warren, Michigan, 48090-9055, United States, 586-986-0638
Tao Xie
Affiliation:
tao.xie@gm.com, General Motors Corp., Materials and Processes lab., Warren, Michigan, United States
Get access

Abstract

Although epoxy-based polymers remain infrequently used as shape memory polymers (SMP’s), they are a promising base material for highly demanding applications due to their intrinsic physical properties and ease of processing. A series of epoxy SMP’s was synthesized with varying mechanical properties and with glass transition temperatures ranging from 31 to 93 °C, tunable via the variations of the molecular structures. The influence of chemical structures and physical properties of these epoxy SMP’s on their shape memory (SM) behavior is examined in detail along with the impact of the shape memory cycling conditions. While the results show that lower crosslink densities and/or higher molecular flexibility/mobility leads decreased SM performance, at low crosslink density the effect of molecular flexibility/mobility becomes dominant in influencing the SM response.

Keywords

polymermacromolecular structureviscoelasticity
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1190: Symposium NN – Active Polymers , 2009 , 1190-NN01-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vili, Y.Y.F.C., Textile Research Journal 77(5), 290 (2007).10.1177/0040517507078794Google Scholar
2 Dietsch, B. Tong, T. Journal of Advanced Materials 39(2), 3 (2007).Google Scholar
3 Ratna, D. Karger-Kocsis, J., Journal of Materials Science 43(1), 254 (2008).10.1007/s10853-007-2176-7Google Scholar
4 McKnight, G.P. Henry, C. P. Proceedings of SPIE 6929 (Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional and Composite Materials), 692919/1 (2008).Google Scholar
5 Sokolowski, W. Metcalfe, A. Hayashi, A. Yahia, L.H. Raymond. J., J. Biomedical Materials 2(1), S23 (2007).10.1088/1748-6041/2/1/S04Google Scholar
6 Xie, T. Rousseau, I.A. Polymer 50(8), 1852 (2009).10.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.035Google Scholar
7 Sahoo, N.G. Jung, Y.C. Goo, N.S. Cho, J.W. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 290(11), 1049 (2005).10.1002/mame.200500211Google Scholar
8 Razzaq, M. Y. Frormann, L. Polymer Composites 28(3), 287 (2007).10.1002/pc.20283Google Scholar
9 Sahoo, N.G. Jung, Y.C. Cho, J.W. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 22(4), 419 (2007).10.1080/10426910701232857Google Scholar
10 Ohki, T. Ni, Q.-Q., Ohsako, N. Iwamoto, M. Composites, Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing 35A(9), 1065 (2004).10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.001Google Scholar
11 Rousseau, I.A. Polymer Engineering and Science 48(11), 2075 (2008).10.1002/pen.21213Google Scholar
12 Rousseau, I.A. Xie, T. Proceedings of SPIE (2009) (in Press).Google Scholar