Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T07:04:41.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing Effects on the Microstructure of Sol-Gel Derived SBNThin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

L.A. Momoda ,
M.C. Gust  and
M.L. Mecartney
L.A. Momoda
Affiliation:
Hughes Research Laboratories, 3011 Malibu Canyon Rd., Malibu, CA 90265
M.C. Gust
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Calif. Irvine
M.L. Mecartney
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Calif. Irvine
Get access

Abstract

Microstructural changes in sol-gel derived SrxBa1-xNb2O6 (SBN) thinfilms were monitored as a function of chemical variations in the precursorsol and of processing variations of the thin films. 6000À Sr0.5Ba0.5Nb2O6 thin filmswere deposited from different alkoxide based precursors under varioushydrolysis conditions. The tetragonal tungsten bronze structure was achievedin films at temperatures on the order of 700°C. Preferential (001)orientation of the tetragonal lattice was found to be very dependent uponthe substrate orientation as well as thermal treatment schedule.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to examine the filmmicrostructure. Orientational effects were verified by TEM as well as atendency for a porous structure in the alkoxide derived films. Substrate andprocessing dependent grain size and size distributions were also noted.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 346: Symposium N – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry VI , 1994 , 297
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 Hirano, S., Yogo, T., Kikuta, K. and Ogiso, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 75, 1697 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Xu, Y., Chen, C.J., Xu, R. and Mackenzie, J.D., Phys. Rev. B, 44, 35 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Mehtotra, R.C., Structure and Bonding, 77, 1 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Van Damme, N.S., Sutherland, A.E., Jones, L., Bridger, K. and Winzer, S.R., J. Am. Ceram.Soc, 74, 1785 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Deshpande, S.B., Potdar, H.S., Godbole, P.D. and Date, S.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 75, 2581(1992).Google Scholar
6 Joshi, V.L. and Mecartney, M.L., J. Mater. Res., 8, 2668 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Hsueh, C.C. and Mecartney, M.L., J. Mater. Res., 6, 2208 (1991).Google Scholar
8 Barlingay, C.K. and Dey, S.K., Ceramic Trans., 25 265 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Chen, J., Brooks, K.G., Udayakumar, K.R. and Cross, L.E. in Ferroelectric Thin Films II, edited by Kingon, A., Myers, E. and Tuttle, B. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp Proc. 243, San Francisco, 1992 ) pp. 33-38.Google Scholar