Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T19:41:48.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interdiffusion Kinetics and Magnetic Properties of TA-Permalloy Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

I. Hashim ,
H. A. Atwater ,
K. T. Y. Kung  and
R. M. Valletta
I. Hashim
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
H. A. Atwater
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
K. T. Y. Kung
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA 95120
R. M. Valletta
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA 95120
Get access

Abstract

The interdiffusion kinetics of ultrahigh vacuum deposited Ta/Ni81Fe19 short-period multilayers films have been investigated, and changes in microstructure were related to magnetic properties. Small angle X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy were used to study layer morphology evolution and interdiffusion during post-growth isothermal annealing in the temperature range 300 – 600°C. The kinetic analysis suggests that interface roughening due to grain growth, and grain-boundary mediated diffusion of Ta occurs concurrently at early anneal times in the Ni81Fe19 films. Subsequent grainboundary and lattice diffusion of Ta lead to a reduction of magnetization and increase in coercivity of Ni81Fe19.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 232: Symposium T – Magnetic Materials: Microstructure and Properties , 1991 , 159
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Mayadas, A.F. and Shatzkes, M., Phys. Rev. B 1, 1382 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Krongelb, S., Gangulee, A. and Das, G., IEEE Trans. Mag. 9, 568 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Anderson, R.L., Gangulee, A. and Romankiw, L.T., J. Electr. Mater. 2, 161 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 333 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Hansen, P., in Constitution of Binary Alloys, (McGraw Hill, 1958) p. 1045.Google Scholar
[6] Bozorth, R.M., in Ferromagnetism, (Van Nostrand, 1957) p. 823.Google Scholar
[7] Goldman, L.M., Atwater, H.A. and Spaepen, F., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. 160, 571 (1990).Google Scholar
[8] Miedema, A.R., de Boer, F.R. and Boom, R., in CALPHAD vol.1, (Permagon Press, 1977), p. 341.Google Scholar
[9] Spaepen, F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 37, 207 (1985).Google Scholar
[10] Hoffman, R., Pickus, F. and Wood, R., Trans. AIME 206, 483 (1956).Google Scholar
[11] Peterson, N.L., in Solid State Physics, vol.22, edited by Seitz, F., Turnbull, D. and Ehrenreich, H., (Academic Press, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
[12] Shewmon, P.G., in Diffusion in Solids, (Williams Book Company, 1983), p. 164.Google Scholar