Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T06:59:36.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Ultrasonic Radiation on Gelation and Properties of Ormosils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Kazuki Monta ,
Yi Hu  and
John D. Mackenzie
Kazuki Monta
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024
Yi Hu
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024
John D. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90024
Get access

Abstract

Ultrasound has been applied to organically modified silicates (ORMOSILs) solutions during gelation. A series of silica and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composites have been prepared by the sol-gel method. Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), PDMS, water and a HC1 catalyst were mixed and exposed to 20 kHz ultrasonic radiation under different conditions. Ultrasonic radiation made it possible to obtain wet gels in 5 to 30 min. without solvent (e.g. alcohol, and THF). And exothermic reaction was observed due to hydrolysis and polycondensation of TEO S. The reaction process was examined by liquid state 29Si NM R. Densities of obtained sono-ORMOSILs were observed to be higher than those produced by ordinary processes. Some sono-ORMOSIL samples demonstrated extremely low porosity and low specific surface areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 271: Symposium N – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry V , 1992 , 693
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lintner, B., Arfsten, N., Dislich, H., Schmidt, H., Philipp, G., and Seiferling, B., J. Non-Cyst. Solids, 100, pp.378–382 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hu, Y., and Mackenzie, J. D., J. Mater. Sci. (1992) to be publishedGoogle Scholar
3. Makishima, A., and Tani, T., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 69, c72 ( 1986)Google Scholar
4. Fitzgerald, M. E., Griffing, V., and Sullivan, J., J. Chem. Phys., 25, No.5, pp.926–932 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kruus, P., Ultrasonics, Sept. pp.201–204 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Suslick, K. S., ed. Ultrasound, Its Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects, VCH Publishers, Weinheim RFA (1988)Google Scholar
7. Tarasevich, M., Ceram. Bull., 63, p.500 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Esquivias, L., and Zarzycki, J., Proc. 1st. Int. Workshop on non-Cryst. Solids, pp.409–414 (1986)Google Scholar
9. Esquivias, L., and Zarzycki, J., 3rd Int. Conf. on Ultrastructure Processing of Ceramics, Glasses and Composites, pp.255–270 (1987)Google Scholar
10. de la Rosa Fox, N., Esquivias, L., and Zarzycki, J., 2nd Int. Conf. The Effects of Modes of Formation on the Structure of Glasses, pp.363–374(1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar