Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-tw422 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-23T09:08:35.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dopant Incorporation in Silicon During NonequilibriumSolidification: Comparison of Two Processes 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

E.P. Fogarassy
Affiliation:
Guest scientist from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, 67037, FRANCE
D.H. Lowndes
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
On sabbatical at the Microelectronics Center of North Carolina, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 and the Materials Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27650.
C.W. White
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

The incorporation properties of implanted or deposited Sb into the siliconlattice during laser irradiation with a UV laser has been studied. For bothimplanted or deposited Sb, we find a maximum substitutional concentration of2.1 × 1021/cm3 following laser melting andsolidification at V ; 6 m/sec. In both cases, substitutional solubility islimited by inter-facial instabilities which develop during regrowth. For thedeposited case we observe in addition a much larger cellular microstructurewhich may result from convection induced instabilities.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, USDOE undercontract DE-ACO5-840R21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems,Inc.

References

REFERENCES

1. See for example, Laser Annealing of Semiconductors, ed. by Poate, J. M. and Mayer, James W., Academic Press, New York (1982).Google Scholar
2. White, C. W., Wilson, S.R., Appleton, B.R., and Young, F.W. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 738 (1980).Google Scholar
3. White, C.W., J. de Physique T44, 145 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Fogarassy, E., Stuck, R., Grob, J. J. A., and Siffert, P., Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Material, ed. by White, C.W., and Peercy, P.S., Academic Press, New York (1980) p. 117.Google Scholar
5. Fogarassy, E., Stuck, R., Toulemonde, M., Salles, D., and Siffert, P., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 5059 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Trumbore, F., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 39, 205 (1960).Google Scholar
7. Auston, D.H., Surko, C.M., Venkatesan, T. N. C., Slusher, R.E., and Golovchenko, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 33(5) 437 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Narayan, J., Naramoto, H., and White, C.W., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 912 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 1283 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Mullins, W.W. and Sekerka, R.F., J. Appl. Phys. 35, 444 (1964).Google Scholar
11. Aziz, M., private communication.Google Scholar
12. van Gurp, G. J., Eggermont, G. E. J., Tamminga, Y., Stacy, W.T., and Gijsbers, J. R. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 273 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Possin, G.E., Parks, H.G., and Chiang, S.W., P. 73 in Ref. 7.Google Scholar