Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T16:41:40.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison Study of a-SiGe Solar Cells and Materials Deposited Using Different Hydrogen Dilution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

H. Povolny ,
P. Agarwal ,
S. Han  and
X. Deng
H. Povolny
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606
P. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606
S. Han
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606
X. Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606
Get access

Abstract

A-SiGe n-i-p solar cells with i-layer deposited via plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) with a germane to disilane ratio of 0.72 and hydrogen dilution R=(H2 flow)/(GeH4+Si2H6 flow) values of 1.7, 10, 30, 50, 120, 180 and 240 were deposited on stainless steel substrates. This germane to disilane ratio is what we typically use for the i-layer in the bottom cell of our standard triple-junction solar cells. Solar cell current-voltage curves (J-V) and quantum efficiency (QE) were measured for these devices. Light soaking tests were performed for these devices under 1 sun light intensity at 50° C. While device with R=30 showed the highest initial efficiency, the device with R=120 exhibit higher stabilized efficiency after 1000 hours of light soaking.

Single-layer a-SiGe films (∼500 nm thick) were deposited under the same conditions as the i-layer of these devices on a variety of substrates including 7059 glass, crystalline silicon, and stainless steel for visible-IR transmission spectroscopy, FTIR, and hydrogen effusion studies. It is interesting to note 1) the H content in the film decreased with increasing R based on both the IR and H effusion measurements, and 2) while the H content changes significantly with different R, the change in Eg is relatively small. This is most likely due to a change in Ge content in the film for different R.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 609: Symposium A – Amorphous & Heterogeneous Silicon Thin Films – 2000 , 2000 , A30.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yang, L., Chen, L., and Catalano, A., MRS Proc. 219, 259 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Yang, J., Xu, X. and Guha, S., MRS Proc. 336, 687 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Shima, M., Isomura, M., Maruyama, E., Okamoto, S., Haku, H., Wakisaka, K., Kiyama, S., and Tsuda, S., MRS Proc. 507, 145 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Guha, S., Narasimhan, K.L., and Pietruszko, S.M., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 859 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Tanaka, K. and Matsuda, A., MRS Proc. 70, 245 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Yang, J. and Guha, S., MRS Proc. 557, 239 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Swanepoel, R., J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 16, pp. 1214–1222 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Compaan, A. D. and Deng, X., University of Toledo 1999 2nd Quarterly Report submitted to NREL under the Thin Film Partnership Program (1999).Google Scholar
9. Yang, J., Ross, R., Glatfelter, T., Mohr, R., and Guha, S., MRS Proc. 149, 435 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Deng, X., Liao, X. B., Han, S., Povolny, H., Agarwal, P., Solar Energy Mat. & Solar Cells, 2000.Google Scholar