Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T12:35:04.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Natural and Experimental Corrosion of Poorly Durable Potash-Lime-Silica Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

G.I. Cooper  and
G.A. Cox
G.I. Cooper
Affiliation:
University of York, Department of Physics, York, United Kingdom.
G.A. Cox
Affiliation:
University of York, Department of Physics, York, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Naturally corroded, poorly durable glasses are compared with results from MCC-4 leach tests on similar glasses. It is suggested that different corrosion products are formed at different temperatures; therefore, care should be taken when interpreting experimental leach rates. Solution composition, pH and flow around the sample can also have a profound effect on corrosion rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 525
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Brantley, S.L., in Water-Rock Interaction, edited by Kharaka, and Maest, (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992), pp.3–6.Google Scholar
2 Grambow, B., in Saftev assessment of radioactive waste repositories, (Organisation for economic cooperation and development, 1990), pp.439–458.Google Scholar
3 Dran, J.-C., Delia Mea, G., Paccagnella, A. and Trotignon, L., Phys. Chem. Glasses. 29, 249 (1989)Google Scholar
4 Paul, A., in Chemistry of glasses. 2nd ed., edited by A. Paul (Chapman and Hall, New York. 1990), pp. 179–218.Google Scholar
5 Strachan, D.M., Barnes, B.O. and Turcotte, R.P., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management III. edited by Moore, J.G. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1981), p.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Cooper, G.I., Cox, G.A. and Perutz, R.N., Microscopy, J. 170 (2), 111 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Hench, L.L., Newton, R.G. and Bernstein, S., Glass Technol. 20 (4), 144 (1979).Google Scholar
8 Crovisier, J.-L., Honnorez, J., Fritz, B. and Petit, J.-C., Appl. Geochem., Suppl. 1, 55 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Price, W.J., in Spectrochemical analysis by atomic absorption, (Heydon and Son Ltd., London, 1979), pp. 112–164.Google Scholar
10 Mullin, and Riley, , Anal. Chim. Acta. 12, 162 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Cooper, G.I., Cox, G.A. and Perutz, R.N., Proceedings of the 1991 conference; Archaeological Sciences. (University of York) (in press).Google Scholar
12 IIer, R.K., in The colloid chemistry of silica and silicates. (Cornell University Press, New York, 1955), pp.127–180 Google Scholar
13 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th ed., edited by West, R.C. (CRC Press, Florida, 1984), p.B138,P.D69, 79.Google Scholar
14 Wick, E., Kolloid-Z, . 86, 167 (1939).Google Scholar
15 Cox, G.A. and Ford, B.A., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3146 (1989).Google Scholar
16 Ross, S.D., in The infrared spectra of minerals, edited by Farmer, V.C. (Mineralogical Society Monograph 4, London, 1974) pp.383–422, pp.423–444.Google Scholar
17 Paul, A., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 2246 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Jantzen, C.M. and Plodinec, M.J., J. Non-Crystalline Solids 67, 207 (1984).Google Scholar
19 Newton, R.G. and Paul, A., Glass Technol. 21 (6), 307 (1980).Google Scholar
20 Barkatt, A., Saad, E.E., Adiga, R., Sousanpour, W., Barkatt, A., Adel-Hadadi, M.A., O’Keefe, J.A. and Alterescu, S., Appl. Geochem. 4 (6), 593 (1989).Google Scholar
21 Vandiver, P.B., in Corrosion of glass, ceramics and ceramic superconductors, edited by Clark, D.E. and Zoitos, B. (Noyes Publications, 1992), pp.393–430.Google Scholar
22 Grambow, B., Jercinovic, M.J., Ewing, R.C. and Byers, C.D., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 50, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp.263–272.Google Scholar
23 Dienert, F. and Wandenbulcke, F., Compt. Rend. 176, 146, 1478–1480 (1923).Google Scholar
24 Douglas, R.W. and El-Shamy, T.M.M., J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 50 (1), 1 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Isard, J.O., Allnatt, A.R. and Melling, P.J., Phys. Chem. Glasses 23 (6), 185 (1982).Google Scholar
26 Cox, G.A. and Khooli, A.-R., Glass Technology 33 (2), 60 (1992).Google Scholar