Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T21:30:14.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the thermal processing and mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether ether ketone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2019

Russell Wang Open the ORCID record for Russell Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Kang-jie Cheng ,
Rigoberto C. Advincula  and
Qiyi Chen
Russell Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Comprehensive Care, Case Western Reserve University School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
Kang-jie Cheng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of E&M, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310014, China
Rigoberto C. Advincula
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Sciences & Engineering, Case Western Reserve University School of Engineering, Cleveland, OH, USA
Qiyi Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Sciences & Engineering, Case Western Reserve University School of Engineering, Cleveland, OH, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Russell Wang at rxw26@case.edu
Get access

Abstract

Because of its unique mechanical, chemical, and biological properties, 3D-printed polyether ether ketone (PEEK) has great potential as customized bone replacement and other metal alloy implant replacement. PEEK samples were printed using fused deposition modeling (FDM) and evaluated in terms of their dimensional accuracy, crystallinity, and mechanical properties. Crystallinity and mechanical properties increased with elevated chamber temperature and post-printing annealing. Variations of material properties from three printers are evident. Many factors affect the quality of 3D-printed PEEK. Future FDA regulations for 3D-printed products are needed for this highly customizable manufacturing process to ensure safety and effectiveness for biomedical applications.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 1046 - 1052
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kurtz, S.M.: PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. 2nd ed. (William Andrew Publisher, Oxford, 2019).Google Scholar
2.Hee, H.T. and Kundnani, V.: Rationale for use of polyether ether ketone polymer interbodycage device in cervical spine surgery. J. Spine 10, 66 (2010).Google Scholar
3.Toth, J.M., Wang, M., Estes, B.T., Scifertd, J.L., Seim, H.B. III, and Turner, A.S.: Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27, 324 (2006).Google Scholar
4.Rae, P., Brown, E., and Orler, E.: The mechanical properties of poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) with emphasis on the large compressive strain response. Polymer 48, 598 (2007).Google Scholar
5.Do, A.V., Khorsand, B., Geary, S.M., and Salem, A.K.: 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 1742 (2015).Google Scholar
6.Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., and Bandyopadhyay, A.: Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater. Today 16, 496 (2013).Google Scholar
7.An, J., Teoh, J.E., Suntornnond, R., and Chua, C.K.: Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering 1, 261 (2015).Google Scholar
8.VICTREX® PEEK 450G: https://www.victrex.com/~/media/datasheets/victrex_tds_450g.pdf.Google Scholar
9.Dizon, J.R.C., Espera, A.H., Chen, Q., and Advincula, R.C.: Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit. Manuf. 20, 44 (2018).Google Scholar
10.Jin, L., Ball, J., Bremner, T., and Sue, H.J.: Crystallization behavior and morphological characterization of poly(ether ether ketone). Polymer 55, 5255 (2016).Google Scholar
11.Conrad, T.L., Jaekel, D.J., Kurtz, S.M., and Roeder, R.K.: Effects of the mold temperature on the mechanical properties and crystallinity of hydroxyapatite whisker-reinforced polyetheretherketone scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 101, 576 (2013).Google Scholar
12.Talbott, M.F., Springer, G.S., and Berglund, L.A.: The effects of crystallinity on the mechanical properties of PEEK polymer and graphite fiber reinforced PEEK. J. Compos. Mater. 21, 1056 (1987).Google Scholar
13.Wu, W.Z., Geng, P., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., Rosen, D.W., and Zhang, H.B.: Manufacture and thermal deformation analysis of semicrystalline polymer polyether ether ketone by 3D printing. Mater. Res. Innov. 18, S12 (2014).Google Scholar
14.Turner, B.N. and Gold, S.A.: A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp. J. 21, 250 (2015).Google Scholar
15.Zalaznik, M., Kalin, M., and Novak, S.: Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer. Tribol. Int. 94, 92 (2016).Google Scholar
16.Bas, C., Grillet, A.C., Thimon, F., and Alberola, N.D.: Crystallization kinetics of poly(aryl ether ether ketone): time-temperature-transformation and continuous cooling transformation diagrams. Eur. Polym. J. 31, 911 (1997).Google Scholar
17.Yang, C.C., Tian, X.Y., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., and Shi, C.Q.: Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 248, 1 (2017).Google Scholar
18.Wu, W.Z., Geng, P., Li, G.W., Zhao, D., Zhang, H.B., and Zhao, J.: Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials 8, 5834 (2015).Google Scholar
19.Valentan, B., Kadivnik, Z., Brajlih, T., Anderson, A., and Drstvensek, I.: Processing poly(ether etherketone) on a 3d printer for thermoplastic modelling. Mater. Technol. 47, 715 (2013).Google Scholar
20.Chivers, R.A. and Moore, D.R.: The effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on the mechanical properties of injection moulded poly(aryl-ether-etherketone) resin. Polymer 35, 110 (1994).Google Scholar
21.Vaezi, M. and Shoufeng, Y.: Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10, 123 (2015).Google Scholar
22.Arkhireyeva, A. and Hashemi, S.: Effect of temperature on work of fracture parametersin poly(ether-ether ketone) (PEEK) film. Eng. Fract. Mech. 71, 789 (2004).Google Scholar
23.El-Qoubaa, Z. and Othman, R.: Tensile behavior of polyetheretherketone over a wide range of strain. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 7, Article ID 275937 (2015). doi:10.1155/2015/275937.Google Scholar
24.Di Prima, M., Coburn, J., Hwang, D., Kell, J., Khairuzzaman, A., and Ricles, L.: Additively manufactured medical products–the FDA perspective. 3D Print. Med. 2, 1 (2016).Google Scholar
25.US Food and Drug Administration: 510(k) Premarket notification. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm (accessed March 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.3 KB