Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T00:44:05.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational Analysis of Coupled Anisotropic Chemical Expansion in Li2-XMnO3-δ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Christine James ,
Yan Wu ,
Brian Sheldon  and
Yue Qi
Christine James*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A.
Yan Wu
Affiliation:
General Motors Global Research & Development Center, 30500 Mound Road, Warren, MI 48090, U.S.A.
Brian Sheldon
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, U.S.A.
Yue Qi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: jamesch8@egr.msu.edu)
Get access

Abstract

During the activation and charge process, vacancies are generated in the Li2MnO3 component in lithium-rich layered cathode materials. The chemical expansion coefficient tensor associated with oxygen vacancies, lithium vacancies and a Li-O vacancy pair were calculated for Li2-xMnO3-δ. The chemical expansion coefficient was larger for oxygen vacancies than for lithium vacancies in most directions. Additionally, the chemical expansion coefficient for a Li-O vacancy pair was shown to not be a linear sum of the chemical expansion coefficients of the two vacancy types, suggesting that the oxygen vacancies and lithium vacancies in Li2-XMnO3-δ exhibit a coupling effect.

Keywords

defectsoxidesimulation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 15: Energy and Sustainability , 2016 , pp. 1037 - 1042
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Thackeray, M. M., Kang, S. H., Johnson, C. S., Vaughey, J. T., Benedek, R., and Hackney, S. A., Journal of Materials Chemistry 17, 3112–3125 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathiya, M., Ramesha, K., Rousse, G., Foix, D., Gonbeau, D., Prakash, A. S., Doublet, M. L., Hemalatha, K., and Tarascon, J. M., Chemistry of Materials 25, 1121–1131 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandowara, S., and Sheldon, B., Electro-chemical Society Transactions 11, 191–196 (2008).Google Scholar
Soni, S. K., Sheldon, B. W., Xiao, X. C., and Tokranov, A., Scripta Materialia 64, 307–310 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Er, D., Li, J., Cargnello, M., Fornasiero, P., Gorte, R. J., and Shenoy, V. B., Journal of the Electrochemical Society 161, F3060–F3064 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillan, M. J., Journal of Physics C-Solid State Physics 17, 1473–1488 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C., Wu, Y., Sheldon, B. W. and Qi, Y., “The Impact of Oxygen Vacancies on Lithium Vacancy Formation and Diffusion in Li2-xMnO3-δ” Solid State Ionics, submitted.Google Scholar
Kresse, G., and Hafner, J., Physical Review B 47, 558–561 (1993).Google Scholar
Kresse, G., and Hafner, J., Physical Review B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).Google Scholar
Kresse, G., and Furthmuller, J., Computational Materials Science 6, 15–50 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kresse, G., and Furthmuller, J., Physical Review B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M., Physical Review Letters 77, 3865–3868 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M., Physical Review Letters 78, 1396–1396 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, Y., Hector, L. G., James, C., and Kim, K. J., Journal of the Electrochemical Society 161, F3010–F3018 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momma, K., and Izumi, F., Journal of Applied Crystallography 44, 1272–1276 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar