No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2022
Political economy, as a field of study, now generally refers to work on the interplay of state actors and the macroeconomy. As practiced by economists, political scientists, and legal scholars, political economy concerns the behavior of central bankers, the impacts of changes in the tax code, world trade negotiations. It has to do with policy. But to historians of economics, the term “political economy” is more likely to call to mind thinkers who engaged in economic reasoning a century or more ago: Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say, Karl Marx. For many historians of economics, “political economy” functions as a shorthand: “economics” avant la lettre. Evoking a time before the formal disciplinization of “economics,” “political economy” suggests a more humanistic perspective, “economics” a more scientistic one. Whereas the term “economics” has been used to refer to an academic discipline, practiced by disinterested intellectuals, the term “political economy,” in both its usages, highlights the close connection between economic ideas and political action.
1 Gide, Charles and Rist, Charles, Histoire des doctrines économiques (Paris, 1909)Google Scholar; Schumpeter, Joseph A. and Schumpeter, Elizabeth Boody, History of Economic Analysis (London, 1954)Google Scholar; Robbins, Lionel, A History of Economic Thought: The LSE Lectures (Princeton, 1998)Google Scholar.
2 Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John, That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Coats, A. W., “The American Economic Association and the Economics Profession,” Journal of Economic Literature 23 (1985), 1697–1727Google Scholar; Maloney, John, Marshall, Orthodoxy, and the Professionalisation of Economics (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar.
4 Reuben, Julie, The Making of the Modern University (Chicago, 1996)Google Scholar; Kirby, William C., Empires of Ideas: Creating the Modern University from Germany to America to China (Cambridge, 2022)Google Scholar.
5 Alfred Marshall to Oscar Browning, 1 May 1901, in The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, ed. John K. Whitaker, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1996) 2: 311–12.
6 Bloch, Marc, The Historian's Craft (New York, 1964), Ch. 1Google Scholar.
7 Furner, Mary and Supple, Barry, eds., The State and Economic Knowledge (Cambridge, 2002)Google Scholar.
8 Chris Buckley, “Chen Yizi, a Top Adviser Forced to Flee China, Dies at 73,” New York Times, 25 April 2014, at www.nytimes.com/2014/04/26/world/asia/chen-yizi-a-top-adviser-forced-to-flee-china-dies-at-73.html.
9 Thornton, Christy, Revolution in Development: Mexico and the Governance of the Global Economy (Berkeley, 2021)Google Scholar; Offer, Amy, Sorting Out the Mixed Economy: The Rise and Fall of Welfare and Developmental States in the Americas (Princeton, 2019)Google Scholar; Dekker, Erwin, Jan Tinbergen (1903–1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise (Cambridge, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Alexander, Sadie T. M., Democracy, Race, and Justice: The Speeches and Writings of Sadie T. M. Alexander, ed. Banks, Nina (New Haven, 2021)Google Scholar.