Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-n7lw4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-03T07:50:42.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridgesite-(Ce), a new rare earth element sulfate, with a unique crystal structure, from Tynebottom Mine, Cumbria, United Kingdom

Part of: Minerals, crystal structures and geochemistry - Peter Williams special issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2022

Mike S. Rumsey Open the ORCID record for Mike S. Rumsey [Opens in a new window] ,
Frank C. Hawthorne Open the ORCID record for Frank C. Hawthorne [Opens in a new window] ,
John Spratt Open the ORCID record for John Spratt [Opens in a new window] ,
Jens Najorka  and
Wren Montgomery
Mike S. Rumsey*
Affiliation:
Mineral and Planetary Science Collections, Department of Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
Frank C. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
John Spratt
Affiliation:
Core Research Laboratories, Department of Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
Jens Najorka
Affiliation:
Core Research Laboratories, Department of Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
Wren Montgomery
Affiliation:
Core Research Laboratories, Department of Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
*
*Author for correspondence: Mike S. Rumsey, Email: m.rumsey@nhm.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bridgesite-(Ce), (IMA2019-034), was discovered at Tynebottom Mine, Cumbria, UK. It occurs as thin (1–2 μm) translucent blue crystals with a lath-like to acicular habit, aggregated into thin crusts and is associated mainly with brochantite, malachite, serpierite, devilline, gypsum, aragonite, jarosite, pyrite, lanthanite-(Ce) and undifferentiated iron oxyhydroxides, it is often intergrown with these other minerals. The lustre, hardness, cleavage and parting could not be determined, nor could density be measured due to crystal size. It has a pale blue streak and is brittle with a splintery fracture. Bridgesite-(Ce) is biaxial (–), shows no pleochroism and has refractive indices (white light): α = 1.526(2), β = 1.564(2), γ = 1.572(2) and 2V(calc) = 48.3°. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 44 negative charges is Ca0.86REEΣ1.99Al0.07Cu5.95(SO4)3.99(SiO4)0.05(PO4)0.02(OH)11.52⋅8H2O. The idealised formula is CaCe2Cu6(SO4)4(OH)12⋅8H2O, requiring (wt.%): 3.91 CaO, 22.89 Ce2O3, 33.28 CuO, 22.33 SO3 and 17.59 H2O. Bridgesite-(Ce) is monoclinic, space group C2/m, a = 24.801(5), b = 6.3520(13), c = 11.245(2) Å, β = 114.51(3)°, V = 1611.9(6) Å and Z = 2. The five most intense X-ray diffraction peaks in the measured pattern are [d in Å (I, %) (hkl)]: 11.3 (100) (200), 6.391 (15) (201), 2.770 (8) (420), 3.194 (6) (402) and 4.858 (5) (310). The crystal structure was solved using single crystal data and refined to an R1 index of 5.86%. Bridgesite-(Ce) contains three distinct Cu sites containing Cu2+, two are coordinated octahedrally and one is square pyramidal. The octahedra form chains through edge sharing parallel to the b-axis which are linked by the square pyramid to form sheets oriented parallel to {100}. Sulfate tetrahedra decorate the sheets which are held together by interstitial REE3+, Ca2+ and hydrogen bonding. The structure is unique. Despite apparent similarity in chemical formula, bridgesite-(Ce) is not closely related to any other natural Cu-sulfate mineral. An FTIR absorption spectra is presented for reference purposes.

Keywords

new mineralunique element combinationcrystal structureceriumREEUnited KingdomTynebottompost mininganthropocene
Type
Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 570 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is part of a thematic set that honours the contributions of Peter Williams

Associate Editor: G. Diego Gatta

References

Bartelmehs, K.L., Bloss, F.D., Downs, R.T. and Birch, J.B. (1992) Excalibr II. Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie, 199, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, T.F. and Green, D.I. (2007). Zoned oxidation deposits in Tynebottom Mine, Garrigill, Cumbria. Journal of the Russell Society, 10, 3–9.Google Scholar
Brown, I.D. (2016) The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry. The Bond Valence Model. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1996) Static and dynamic Jahn-Teller effects in Cu2+-oxysalt minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 34, 1089–1105.Google Scholar
Dunham, K.C. (1948) Geology of the Northern Pennine Orefield. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK, pp. 357.Google Scholar
Eby, R.K. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993) Structural relations in copper oxysalt minerals. I. Structural hierarchy. Acta Crystallographica, B49, 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, O.C. (2018) Bond-length distributions for ions bonded to oxygen: results for the lanthanides and actinides and discussion of the f-block contraction. Acta Crystallographica, B74, 49–62.Google Scholar
Gagné, O.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2015) Comprehensive derivation of bond-valence parameters for ion pairs involving oxygen. Acta Crystallographica B71, 562–578.Google Scholar
Gagné, O.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2018) Bond-length distributions for ions bonded to oxygen: Results for the non-metals and discussion of lone-pair stereoactivity and the polymerization of PO4. Acta Crystallographica, B74, 79–96.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (2012) A bond-topological approach to theoretical mineralogy: crystal structure, chemical composition and chemical reactions. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 39, 841–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (2015) Toward theoretical mineralogy: a bond-topological approach. American Mineralogist, 100, 696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Krivovichev, S.V. and Burns, P.C. (2000) The crystal chemistry of sulfate minerals. Pp. 1–112 in: Sulfate Minerals: Crystallography, Geochemistry and Environmental Significance (C.N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor and D.K. Nordstrom, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 40. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ixer, R.A. (2003), The distribution of rare earth elements in north Pennine fluorspar and fluorite. UK Journal of Mines and Minerals, 23, 21–26.Google Scholar
Ixer, R.A. and Stanley, C.J. (1987). A silver-nickel-cobalt mineralisation at Tynebottom mine, Garrigill, near Alston, Cumbria. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 46, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandarino, J.A. (2007) The Gladstone–Dale compatibility of minerals and its use in selecting mineral species for further study. The Canadian Mineralogist, 45, 1307–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyquist, R.A. and Kagel, R.O. (1971) Infrared Spectra of Inorganic Compounds. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, M.S., Hawthorne, F. and Spratt, J. (2019) Bridgesite-(Ce), IMA 2019-034. CNMNC Newsletter No. 52. Mineralogical Magazine, 83, 887–893.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rumsey et al. supplementary material

Rumsey et al. supplementary material 1

Download Rumsey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 195.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Rumsey et al. supplementary material

Rumsey et al. supplementary material 2

Download Rumsey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13 KB